The Hidden Mission Forum

Full Version: Who is Jastro...and why do I have a needle for this thread?
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5
To Fashion a clown hat,one needs a needle and some fabric with a pom-pom like a cherry on top.

Now Sarh E Hoffman may know a thing or two about kniting but it is too thick for the Yarn we are about to tell you jastro.
We need fine red thread.
I'd advise you,the gauntlet-run is an improv.

begin you... <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/muaha.gif" alt="Muaha" title="muaha" />
I know I'd like to learn more about Jastro so when the time comes I'll know what to write on his tombstone... <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/whistle.gif" alt="Whistle" title="whistle" />

Strange, don't you think, that he's left his profile blank?
Funny...lincoln was like that remember.
Hell...I ain't no Betsy Ross,but weren't Orpbit2 and I discussing knitting a whilst back...Sheesh!

I don't know about RIPs because that sounds a lot like targetting a member with an agenda like Jastro has...instead of talking of pushing up daisies...maybe we can talk clown language and discuss the Squirting Daisy trick...egg on the face is not as comedic as a Pie in the face.
Egg registers as the likely outcome on his face,since he joined to clown around...welcome to The Hidden Circus jastro,yer a member as well as MB...let's all have fun.
Is Jastro James Oberg or is he Don Algae? This doesn't sound like Don Algae at all.

Anyway, Algae is a bureaucratic coward.
Quote:Is Jastro James Oberg or is he Don Algae? This doesn't sound like Don Algae at all.

Anyway, Algae is a bureaucratic coward.

It's hard to say if a CSICOP is an individual or part of a hive-mind.
Quote:It's hard to say if a CSICOP is an individual or part of a hive-mind.

<img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/lol.gif" alt="Lol" title="lol" /> ... link & link
Drives a beamer eats well and hangs with pussy and is a co-author of an NYTimes science bestseller...The american dream.

What has Jastro to offer us I ask??? <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/applause.gif" alt="Applause" title="applause" />
i ask: who does jastro think mike bara is and why does jastro think mike bara is annoyed at everyone?
Why does Jastro have a bee in his bonnet concerning Herr Bara? I know a little about him,
but otherwise, he has done nothing to anybody here.
hey XR, hows it going? i think whats happening here is that jastro has been annoyed by mike bara and has somehow decided for himself that that he has the qualifications and approval to speak for "everybody" somewhat like those fundamentalist religious peoples of whatever faith feel that is there "duty" to be a spokesperson for god
Quote:hey XR, hows it going? i think whats happening here is that jastro has been annoyed by mike bara and has somehow decided for himself that that he has the qualifications and approval to speak for "everybody" somewhat like those fundamentalist religious peoples of whatever faith feel that is there "duty" to be a spokesperson for god

Just like the Ameriqaeda letter terrorist agencies who "speak for us" concerning the law. It is evil and the Big Lie!
He named himself after a dead NASA physicist

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Jastrow

Stooge for Oberg? Who can say he is definitely not on the roosters side
He is on record using the term "Occam's Razor".
That term is a coined phrase that denotes no science.

Common sense is a much simpler.
And the Counter-intuitive has shown to be nearly on par with serendipity for actually discovering things in our world of science.

Watching 'Randi' videos also completely makes for a nice pom-pom

When will he banty about the coined phrase:Paraeidolia...also not an actual scientific word either...but they both are known keywords used by organised internet psuedo-skeptics.

As we can see...he's no match for lincoln
By their fruits ye shall know them.
Indeed Keith.
...now my initials are actually CSI that through improv---leads us to csicop now known as ---csi--- as well.
CSI is a skeptical society with rabid debunkers who have no other purpose than to sway an audience(the "Public")to a dogmatic view.
Being skeptical is not a bad thing at all.
It is when they orgainise and form societies and entrench themselves with figure-heads and tactical rhetoric and ideology that makes each individual a clone of the other drones.
It is much like being a clown...
Certain degrees or "Types" exist.
There is charlie chaplin,bozo,or krusty
Vianova chose a good archetype to work with
and improv never fails to unmask who may lie hidden under the grease-paint.
What "Type" of clown will the hidden circus reveal jastro to be?

So far...like Lincoln:
He is a mime.

Keith,there is a way to "Know" a clown by his fruits... <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/pennywise.gif" alt="Pennywise" title="pennywise" />
Quote:He is on record using the term "Occam's Razor".
That term is a coined phrase that denotes no science.
Common sense is a much simpler.
...from which I think we can legitimately infer that you have some respect for common sense. So much the better.

Would you say common sense lends any support to the following assertions, for example?
Quote:For instance, if one looks at the official patch for the Apollo Program,... it becomes elemental to match the “A” (for “Apollo”) as an actual stand-in for “Asar”—the Egyptian designation for “Osiris.”
Quote:...the new moon craft is named “Orion,” which is a direct reference to Osiris, who is the chief god of [Magicians, Masons and Nazis]. We have an International Space Station that NASA calls the ISS, or IS(I)S,...
Quote:I don’t think NASA has much to do with the “real” space program.

The razor of old man Ockham is a tool of logic or philosophy rather than of science per se, although I believe it has been used in planetary science. To debunk the canals of Mars that Giovanni Schiaparelli (1835 – 1910) thought he saw, for instance. Funny thing about Mars -- all kinds of people delude themselves into seeing completely illogical things up there.

Why hasn't this very silly thread also been moved? Preferably to /dev/null?
perhaps because I'm about to delete it.

Either way, that's a nunya for you, if you get my drift.

You've avoided addressing me so far, yet I'm getting a tiny bit more curious about you.

So tell me,
You reckon to be the Kwisatch Haderach here or something?
I guess 'enlightened one" would be a better term.

Give it up buddy, buddha's already been.

You got to understand
that this is home. . .



. . .and there ain't no Tomorrow-Morrow Land. . .



. . .and I ain't Captain Walker.


There are more than five billion things to talk about,
yet you imagine to focus my place as locus for your attacks against Mike Bara.

So don't you tell me about silliy threads, not after reading yours.

Thanks so much, You can either engage in local discourse or continue your character assassination of non-present others elsewhere.
Funny thing about mars though...
This forum has taught us all much in the past,we learn from each,or teach each other,and now we have a dedicated thread in a forum for you to "show us if you got'em".

There is a SOCIETY in the UK.
The Oldest clown society in the world.

It is named "Clown International"

They have an "Egg Register" where you can trademark your face-paint by applying an egg as model/facsimile copyirght.

I use a frame of reference that qualifies the face on mars for an egg.

In lincoln's thread...we uncovered a needlepoint on Princeon's GCP
(Global Consiousness Project)
While Obama was sworn in and lincoln was entangled in an Improv...

Princeton used "Eggs" and Registered a hit of the need for Transperancey.

---Research the EGG REGISTRY
of Facial copyright.---

The Face is the clown who laughs last as the show goes on.

Truly Improv is the providence of a Jester.
Jastro says......
Quote:The razor of old man Ockham is a tool of logic or philosophy rather than of science per se, although I believe it has been used in planetary science. To debunk the canals of Mars that Giovanni Schiaparelli (1835 – 1910) thought he saw, for instance. Funny thing about Mars -- all kinds of people delude themselves into seeing completely illogical things up there.

That is plain wrong, Jastro!!!

You can't broadbrush yesterday's science like that.
When you talk about "debunking" Schiaparelli (and by inference Percival Lowell) then what you're doing is trashing countless hours of observing time at state-of-the-art telescopes of that time (still excellent optics).

Let me illustrate how I totally disagree with your mindset.
I have a chemistry textbook from the 1850s.
Entire chapters are devoted to discussing the Phlogiston Theory of heat, and experiments with this "fluid".
Maybe it sounds like quackery from today's standpoint, but still it doesn't mean that scientists 150 years ago were stupid or delusional. And there is the likelihood that some inventions were based on Phlogiston Theory...eg. the Franklin Fireplace?

You need to get back to the true scientific imperative...to go where no man has gone before!!!
Quote:what you're doing is trashing countless hours of observing time at state-of-the-art telescopes of that time
Not at all. The observations were heroic (and you didn't even mention how damn cold it gets at night in an observatory.) I have no doubt that both Schiaparelli and Lowell drew what they honestly believed they saw. The error was in the interpretation -- OMG, that must be the work of a civilization! --and that was all down to Lowell rather than Schiaparelli.

It's very obvious that this is a beguiling idea to many people, and similar errors continue to find an interested audience. As recently as October 2007 a book was published claiming evidence of a Martian civilization. It amazes me that this erroneous MS found a publisher, but it did.
Quote: It amazes me that this erroneous MS found a publisher, but it did.
Sounds like envy to me. You're amazed that anybody will publish anything? What the fuck kind of ivory tower are you living in?
Quote:[quote author="Kalter"]what you're doing is trashing countless hours of observing time at state-of-the-art telescopes of that time
Not at all. The observations were heroic (and you didn't even mention how damn cold it gets at night in an observatory.) I have no doubt that both Schiaparelli and Lowell drew what they honestly believed they saw. The error was in the interpretation -- OMG, that must be the work of a civilization! --and that was all down to Lowell rather than Schiaparelli.

It's very obvious that this is a beguiling idea to many people, and similar errors continue to find an interested audience. As recently as October 2007 a book was published claiming evidence of a Martian civilization. It amazes me that this erroneous MS found a publisher, but it did.[/quote]

What do you mean by "Not at all"???
You just got through talking about "debunking" Schiaparelli.
You may as well include every other astronomer from Galileo through Herschel because their observations don't "measure up" to "modern standards".

Personally, I've never understood how Schiaparelli et al saw what they sketched...given the apparent size of Mars at even the highest usable magnification and closest approach to Earth...
Quote:What do you mean by "Not at all"???
You just got through talking about "debunking" Schiaparelli.
Look again. I just got through explaining that the error was not in the observations, but in the interpretation of them.
perhaps,
but then again 'Jastro", I'm interpreting you correctly.
Take a lttile time out from my forum while you consider asnswering me when I'm talking to you.

I don't owe you a damned thing, that includes space for your opinions.
Later, Jasstro! Rofl Applause Poop Rofl
I don't, therefore, need to search through this immense pile of opinion to document the fact that Keith Laney bans commenters who are merely contrary, not necessarily disruptive.

Sweet.
Quote:I don't, therefore, need to search through this immense pile of opinion to document the fact that Keith Laney bans commenters who are merely contrary, not necessarily disruptive.

Sweet.
Contrary is fine. Rude motherfucker gets boot to head.
Right before screen door slams ass.
Jastro...document away to your heart's desire.
But.
Who is your twisted document intended for?

Keith.
I have a sneaky suspicion that you've just been: DOCUMENTED!!!

<img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/rofl.gif" alt="Rofl" title="rofl" />

Document me next!!! Puhlease!!!
Whilst Jastro pulled his pud in his Aged-Aunt's basement lair here he haunts the internet and creeps about without an identity...the hidden circus members document his penile envy of a LARGER PROFILE of another ---MEMBER--- that is the cause and effect of Jastro's blindness.

Jastro...you need a strip-joint...because AUNTIE is looking sexy lateley...eh?

<img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/whistle.gif" alt="Whistle" title="whistle" />
Rude, you say?
Quote:just another whiney troll
Quote:Stick that in your opinionated/judgemental pipe and smoke it.
Quote:another buffoon from the floaters in Phil Plaits septic tank
Quote:What a stupid comment to make.
Quote:Go-olly Uncle Phil, I'm full of bullshit.....
Quote:Are we counting your character flaws now?
Quote:jastro-intestinal ....
Quote:Jastro,
you still sucketh.
Quote:Occam's razor...how jeuvenile... Fun with a little dick-wad.
Quote:your insignificant ignorant posts. Gettouttahere already. geeze. Go play in the circus kiddie
Quote:Whilst Jastro pulled his pud in his Aged-Aunt's basement lair here he haunts the internet and creeps about without an identity...the hidden circus members document his penile envy of a LARGER PROFILE of another ---MEMBER--- that is the cause and effect of Jastro's blindness.

Note in particular, in regard to that last quote, it was from the same commenter who called me juvenile, except he couldn't spell it.

Quote:Rude motherfucker gets boot to head.
Right before screen door slams ass.
Bye EA....

God you guys are fun.
Quote:I don't, therefore, need to search through this immense pile of opinion to document the fact that Keith Laney bans commenters who are merely contrary, not necessarily disruptive.

Sweet.

If he banned people who were contrary on here, then there would be alot of banned people.

Hey, I am not sure as I have not been on here as long as any of you guys, but how many people have been banned total?

Edit: After seeing the post while trying to post this. Yes those are nice comments, now post your comments they were in response to, or were they in response to all your comments?
Bara ENVY..tsk!

Luckily...this thread is not about Mike---it is about you Jastro.

need some kleenex in your life?

You have a Mike Bara thread...we have a Jastro thread...same difference.eh?

What is your Aunt's name again??? eww.
I'm sure she'll evict you once she finds out what you are doing downstairs...Ick!
Quote:Rude, you say?
[quote author="Almon"]just another whiney troll
Quote:Stick that in your opinionated/judgemental pipe and smoke it.
Quote:another buffoon from the floaters in Phil Plaits septic tank
Quote:What a stupid comment to make.
Quote:Go-olly Uncle Phil, I'm full of bullshit.....
Quote:Are we counting your character flaws now?
Quote:jastro-intestinal ....
Quote:Jastro,
you still sucketh.
Quote:Occam's razor...how jeuvenile... Fun with a little dick-wad.
Quote:your insignificant ignorant posts. Gettouttahere already. geeze. Go play in the circus kiddie
Quote:Whilst Jastro pulled his pud in his Aged-Aunt's basement lair here he haunts the internet and creeps about without an identity...the hidden circus members document his penile envy of a LARGER PROFILE of another ---MEMBER--- that is the cause and effect of Jastro's blindness.

Note in particular, in regard to that last quote, it was from the same commenter who called me juvenile, except he couldn't spell it.

Quote:Rude motherfucker gets boot to head.
Right before screen door slams ass.
Bye EA....

God you guys are fun.[/quote]


What? Nothing from lil' old me? :uni: <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/rofl.gif" alt="Rofl" title="rofl" />
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5