...

Looks like I lost Lonesome Trail -- aka Grand Vizier.

Hopefully if I deposit a few more tidbits,

it all might fall into place.

We have two Pi cubits 20.61670179 and 20.62648062

I optimised 20.61670179

because it falls within the Petrie boundaries of Royal Cubit,

whereas 20.62648062 clearly does not.

Grand Vizier pointed to usage of Pi median to arrive at cubit 20.62648062,

but I do it a different way.

GV used the multiplier 360 degrees to arrive at his number,

I use the ancient 360 count system {babylonian 60 count} but the ancient count,

for calendar and a plethora of applications is actually 360 count,

the ancient global civic calendar is 360 days,

mayan = 18 x 20, egyptian sumerian etc 12 x 30.

Many people believe that the earth had an original 360 day year,

I remain in the fence on that one.

the pi cubits {and all cubits with their complimentary synergistic or "mirror " cubit}

will follow this simple equation:

cubit 20.61670179 = 6.5625 x Pi ----> 100 Pi x cubit 20.62648602 = 18 x 360 count

cubit 20.625 = 6.5625 x aPi --- where aPi = 22 / 7

and

18 x 360 = 6480 = 100 x aPi x 20.625

so one side of the equation is balanced to 360 count systems

the other ...

wtf

is

6.5625?

look to the first equation in the ancient phi progressions:

they start with the 365 day Earth and 584 Venus synod CALENDAR COUNT timelines

365 / 584 = 5 / 8 = 0.625

the progression:

Line 1:

1 / phi phi phi sq. ancient pi value

0.625 ---> +1 = 1.625 ---> + 1 = 2.625 ---> x 1.2 = 3.15

those are not PHI etc --->

they occupy the phi positions in the progression --- note 2625 sequence

to make the progression work

simply

always

just

DIVIDE the -- phi position value by the phi sq. position value

and that

will give you the very next ---> inverse phi position to start the same equation again <---

lets skip a step in this fibonacci style progression

step 3

34 / 55 89 / 55 144 / 55 1728 / 550

0.618 18 18~ ----> + 1 = 1.618 18 18~ ----> +1 = 2.618 18 18~ --- x 1.2 = 3.14 18 18~

now divide phi position by phi sq. position

1.618 18 18 / by 2.618 18 18

equals

the

new inverse phi position === 0. 6180555555 = 89 / 144

repeat the process several times

and eventually you arrive at

75025 / 46368 = phi

now back to line 1 ---- and the bold print 2.625 sequence <---

look again at Pi cubit 20.61670179 = 6.5625 x modern pi

align without decimals

65625 / by 2625 = 25

65625 x 584 Venus synod = 105000 x 365 Earth year --- calendar count cycles

OK, we see that 65625 follows the calendar count series.

But now,

watch what happens,

when we go straight to NASA data <------

65625 x NASA data 583.92 Venus synod

equals

tropical earth year 365.2422 x ----> 104915.9982 <---> realign to 104916

the earth year multiple 104915.9982 <---> realign to 104916 {convergence dynamic}

now reduce to lowest common denominators

65625 x 583.92 NASA Venus synod = 104916 x 365.2422 Earth tropical year

reduces to: {factor of 21 reduction}

3125 x NASA data 583.92 = 4996 x Earth Tropical Year 365.242 1938

so what do we see?

NASA Earth tropical year is 365.2422 --- end result was 365.2421938

now review the accuracy:

99. 99999 83 % is the highest extreme accuracy you could ever ask for:

in planetary timeline cycles -- just a hair under 7 sigma esentially

This has a factor of error of ---> !!! ---> 0.04 seconds per Lunar Month <----

the equation Tropical Earth year itself is off by ---> 0.5 seconds <---

That is how Conevrgence Dynamics works.

So by extrapolating the equations with the Pi cubit,

an unprecedented extreme accuracy cycle is revealed,

using

NASA

data.

....

Looks like I lost Lonesome Trail -- aka Grand Vizier.

Hopefully if I deposit a few more tidbits,

it all might fall into place.

We have two Pi cubits 20.61670179 and 20.62648062

I optimised 20.61670179

because it falls within the Petrie boundaries of Royal Cubit,

whereas 20.62648062 clearly does not.

Grand Vizier pointed to usage of Pi median to arrive at cubit 20.62648062,

but I do it a different way.

GV used the multiplier 360 degrees to arrive at his number,

I use the ancient 360 count system {babylonian 60 count} but the ancient count,

for calendar and a plethora of applications is actually 360 count,

the ancient global civic calendar is 360 days,

mayan = 18 x 20, egyptian sumerian etc 12 x 30.

Many people believe that the earth had an original 360 day year,

I remain in the fence on that one.

the pi cubits {and all cubits with their complimentary synergistic or "mirror " cubit}

will follow this simple equation:

cubit 20.61670179 = 6.5625 x Pi ----> 100 Pi x cubit 20.62648602 = 18 x 360 count

cubit 20.625 = 6.5625 x aPi --- where aPi = 22 / 7

and

18 x 360 = 6480 = 100 x aPi x 20.625

so one side of the equation is balanced to 360 count systems

the other ...

wtf

is

6.5625?

look to the first equation in the ancient phi progressions:

they start with the 365 day Earth and 584 Venus synod CALENDAR COUNT timelines

365 / 584 = 5 / 8 = 0.625

the progression:

Line 1:

1 / phi phi phi sq. ancient pi value

0.625 ---> +1 = 1.625 ---> + 1 = 2.625 ---> x 1.2 = 3.15

those are not PHI etc --->

they occupy the phi positions in the progression --- note 2625 sequence

to make the progression work

simply

always

just

DIVIDE the -- phi position value by the phi sq. position value

and that

will give you the very next ---> inverse phi position to start the same equation again <---

lets skip a step in this fibonacci style progression

step 3

34 / 55 89 / 55 144 / 55 1728 / 550

0.618 18 18~ ----> + 1 = 1.618 18 18~ ----> +1 = 2.618 18 18~ --- x 1.2 = 3.14 18 18~

now divide phi position by phi sq. position

1.618 18 18 / by 2.618 18 18

equals

the

new inverse phi position === 0. 6180555555 = 89 / 144

repeat the process several times

and eventually you arrive at

75025 / 46368 = phi

now back to line 1 ---- and the bold print 2.625 sequence <---

look again at Pi cubit 20.61670179 = 6.5625 x modern pi

align without decimals

65625 / by 2625 = 25

65625 x 584 Venus synod = 105000 x 365 Earth year --- calendar count cycles

OK, we see that 65625 follows the calendar count series.

But now,

watch what happens,

when we go straight to NASA data <------

65625 x NASA data 583.92 Venus synod

equals

tropical earth year 365.2422 x ----> 104915.9982 <---> realign to 104916

the earth year multiple 104915.9982 <---> realign to 104916 {convergence dynamic}

now reduce to lowest common denominators

65625 x 583.92 NASA Venus synod = 104916 x 365.2422 Earth tropical year

reduces to: {factor of 21 reduction}

3125 x NASA data 583.92 = 4996 x Earth Tropical Year 365.242 1938

so what do we see?

NASA Earth tropical year is 365.2422 --- end result was 365.2421938

now review the accuracy:

99. 99999 83 % is the highest extreme accuracy you could ever ask for:

in planetary timeline cycles -- just a hair under 7 sigma esentially

This has a factor of error of ---> !!! ---> 0.04 seconds per Lunar Month <----

the equation Tropical Earth year itself is off by ---> 0.5 seconds <---

That is how Conevrgence Dynamics works.

So by extrapolating the equations with the Pi cubit,

an unprecedented extreme accuracy cycle is revealed,

using

NASA

data.

....