...

GV,

LOL, you announced that you packed your bags from this forum,

and then went nowhere,

which is everywhere that go with your math,

absolutely nowhere.

the Grand Vizoo nowhere man:

Grand Vizier = Epic

Your ancestors were Monkey See and Monkey Poo

and your 365.02wtfwtf value is accurate ????

Mayans used simple count systems.

52 x 365 earth year = 18980

32.5 x 584 venus synod = 18980

those are quite well known ancient values in ancient CALENDAR COUNT systems.

365 and 584 as a fraction 365 / 584 = 0.625 initiates the ancient PHI progressions,

which you obviously know nothing about either.

If you did,

you would know that the progressions produce the fraction 75025 / 46368 = Phi.

You completely ignore that 18980 x 7 Pi = 417392 at over ten decimal accuracy.

You never looked at the data in the ancient Egyptian pi progressions.

The final closest Pi value those progressions attain is:

417392 / 132860 ... where ... 132860 = 364 x 365

A Knucklehead in Blunderland is what you are.

You display your ignorance of HOW the Mayans adjusted their LONG COUNTS,

and if you had ever read anything on the Mayan Calendar Round or Mayan Long Count,

you would know that they had very distinct methods,

of using the 187200 MLC and 18980 MCR,

by adding or subtracting simple multiples of designated units using the numbers 5 and 1,

{stackings and balancing mathematically of designated numbered chips}

to balance the Long Counts.

ie

they understood that 2000 years of 365 days = 730000 days,

and that was short.

All they had to do then for that particular point in Long Count was add ... 100 units of 5,

and they had 730500 for ---> 365.25 x 2000 <--- for long count balancing,

and from there,

for precision accuracy

they added what was necessary to get close enough to 365.25636 x 2000.

That is how they did it.

The math operations I displayed were clearly defined as --- accuracy testing,

because

you have NO ACCURACY in your works,

as has been clearly displayed by you.

You need lots of accuracy lessons Grand Vizoo with Monkey See Monkey Poo ancestry.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I wanted to address the Hancock work that was displayed earlier,

which is much better material than the Vizooburger's monkey pie mumbo jumbo,

but it needs clarification.

Top row 3 pyramids:

The correct 280 cubit height,

and 440 cubit base math,

with two Pi cubits,

and the ancient cubit 20.618 18 18~.

The ancient Egyptians could not enumerate Pi any more than we can,

with it's infinite decimals.

However they could attain 10 decimal accuracy,

with the Pi progression final Pi value fraction {417392 / 132860}.

NOTE: The Pi cubits seen only display ten decimals.

When using TRUE Pi,

those cubits also have infifnite decimals.

If you do the math shown be sure to use the supplied formulas for the cubits,

ie

cubit 20.61670179 = 6.5625 Pi

Bottom row of pyramids:

uses Hancock's {2 / Pi} equation,

and shows how his approximation errors produces differing cubits in height and base.

NOTE:

Bottom row pyramid 1:

height cubit 20.625 produces Pi cubit 20.61670179 as the base length cubit,

making the math work properly.

That is very interesting indeed.

Bottom row pyramid 2:

height uses Pi cubit 20.62648062 ... and the base length result is 756 feet <----

with ancient cubit 20.618 18 18~ <----

Yes indeed.

Bottom row pyramid 3:

uses the averaged Petrie and Cole base lengths <---

as the fixed base length dimension.

Two heights are produced using the equations {2 / Pi} and {2 / aPi},

so the original Hancock math operation reverses.

Note the dynamic results.

huge image link

http://i.imgur.com/EH8X8Ar.jpg

GV,

LOL, you announced that you packed your bags from this forum,

and then went nowhere,

which is everywhere that go with your math,

absolutely nowhere.

the Grand Vizoo nowhere man:

Quote:Well, tell ya what, I talked with my ancestors and they showed me how to do math

Grand Vizier = Epic

Your ancestors were Monkey See and Monkey Poo

Quote:Really? First of all, as I already said, 18980 is NOT an accurate number. It's an approximation.

and your 365.02wtfwtf value is accurate ????

Mayans used simple count systems.

52 x 365 earth year = 18980

32.5 x 584 venus synod = 18980

those are quite well known ancient values in ancient CALENDAR COUNT systems.

365 and 584 as a fraction 365 / 584 = 0.625 initiates the ancient PHI progressions,

which you obviously know nothing about either.

If you did,

you would know that the progressions produce the fraction 75025 / 46368 = Phi.

You completely ignore that 18980 x 7 Pi = 417392 at over ten decimal accuracy.

You never looked at the data in the ancient Egyptian pi progressions.

The final closest Pi value those progressions attain is:

417392 / 132860 ... where ... 132860 = 364 x 365

A Knucklehead in Blunderland is what you are.

You display your ignorance of HOW the Mayans adjusted their LONG COUNTS,

and if you had ever read anything on the Mayan Calendar Round or Mayan Long Count,

you would know that they had very distinct methods,

of using the 187200 MLC and 18980 MCR,

by adding or subtracting simple multiples of designated units using the numbers 5 and 1,

{stackings and balancing mathematically of designated numbered chips}

to balance the Long Counts.

ie

they understood that 2000 years of 365 days = 730000 days,

and that was short.

All they had to do then for that particular point in Long Count was add ... 100 units of 5,

and they had 730500 for ---> 365.25 x 2000 <--- for long count balancing,

and from there,

for precision accuracy

they added what was necessary to get close enough to 365.25636 x 2000.

That is how they did it.

The math operations I displayed were clearly defined as --- accuracy testing,

because

you have NO ACCURACY in your works,

as has been clearly displayed by you.

You need lots of accuracy lessons Grand Vizoo with Monkey See Monkey Poo ancestry.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I wanted to address the Hancock work that was displayed earlier,

which is much better material than the Vizooburger's monkey pie mumbo jumbo,

but it needs clarification.

Top row 3 pyramids:

The correct 280 cubit height,

and 440 cubit base math,

with two Pi cubits,

and the ancient cubit 20.618 18 18~.

The ancient Egyptians could not enumerate Pi any more than we can,

with it's infinite decimals.

However they could attain 10 decimal accuracy,

with the Pi progression final Pi value fraction {417392 / 132860}.

NOTE: The Pi cubits seen only display ten decimals.

When using TRUE Pi,

those cubits also have infifnite decimals.

If you do the math shown be sure to use the supplied formulas for the cubits,

ie

cubit 20.61670179 = 6.5625 Pi

Bottom row of pyramids:

uses Hancock's {2 / Pi} equation,

and shows how his approximation errors produces differing cubits in height and base.

NOTE:

Bottom row pyramid 1:

height cubit 20.625 produces Pi cubit 20.61670179 as the base length cubit,

making the math work properly.

That is very interesting indeed.

Bottom row pyramid 2:

height uses Pi cubit 20.62648062 ... and the base length result is 756 feet <----

with ancient cubit 20.618 18 18~ <----

Yes indeed.

Bottom row pyramid 3:

uses the averaged Petrie and Cole base lengths <---

as the fixed base length dimension.

Two heights are produced using the equations {2 / Pi} and {2 / aPi},

so the original Hancock math operation reverses.

Note the dynamic results.

huge image link

http://i.imgur.com/EH8X8Ar.jpg