08-30-2017, 01:51 AM

...

Well obviously, but that latitude mark isn't on the pyramid apex,

and may be located on something in the interior,

and not necessarily to the video's Grand Gallery choice at all.

The exact King's Chamber latitude would be interesting.

The latitude of the pyramid apex,

so close to being aligned to the speed of light number cannot be a coincidence.

the apex at

29.979233333 degrees in google ... statistically is close enough at about 99.99996 %.

That well exceeds six sigma accuracy.

That is not what is in question.

The video error was in the assigned distance of Pi or 3.141592654 km,

from 30 degree north down to the pyramid.

The distance is about 2.304 km.

Due to that, it now would be excellent to know the exact distances from 30 degrees north,

to the apex and King's Chamber etc.

-----------------------------------

The arrangement of cubit system image diagrams that were posted,

were to show that researchers have to view the Giza pyramids from a perspective of CUBITS,

and multiple interwoven cubit systems,

revolving around a plethora of their cultural cosmological math sciences.

We know they used them,

and they had a large variety of them.

It isn't too difficult to ferret out the highest statistical cubit choices available.

All ancient cubits are available as common simple fractions,

and many have simple replicating decimal sequences.

here are a few,

with heights in 280 cubits

20.628 571428 571428 ~ ---- 481.33333 foot height

20.62643239 = 648000 / 31416 = 8100 / 3927

20.625 --- 481.25 foot height

20.620 285714 285714~ --- 481.14 foot height

20.6189781 = 28248 / 1370 <---

20.618 18 18 18~

20.6171785

20.61675

20.614 285714 285714~ ---- 481 foot height

20.61 --- 480.9 height -- {3 x 687 Mars calendar count sidereal = 2061}

20.606060606~ --- = 68 / 33 --- 480.80 80 80~ height

Pi and square root two related cubits have infinite random decimal patterns,

but can be made into highly convergent fractions which can have 10 decimal accuracy.

Pi cubits

20.62648062

20.61670179

sqrt 2 cubits

20.61923374

20.62394778 = 262.5 / {9 x sqrt2}

Though I stated earlier that mathematically 20.625 had an edge for royal cubit,

my choice is simply to the straight forward 756 foot base length = 9072 inches.

for cubit 1134 / 55 = 20.618 18 18~.

Cubit 20.625 would be easiest to work with, and makes a lot of sense,

especially from a modern perspective,

and was the premier choice of the early Petrie enthusiasts.

Though Petrie originally set the Royal Cubit spread at 20.615 to 20.624,

prior to publishing he edged the spread to:

20.615 to 20.625 inches

for the Royal Cubit,

from King's Chamber measurements.

That spread for Royal Cubit would exclude Pi cubit 20.62648062,

but would include Pi cubit 20.61670179.

If I have to make a top 5 choices, I will keep them in the Petrie spread.

20.618 18 18 18~

20.625

20.61675

20.61670179 pi cubit

20.61923374 sqrt 2 cubit

thus preferring the ancient cubits over the pure modern ones seen.

Any of the above 5 choices can have volumes of valid mathematical evidences to back them.

For my analysis of planetary timeline cycles,

the 756 foot base length,

and the {4 / aPi} = {14 / 11} slope tangent geometry of 440 cubit base and 280 cubit height pyramid,

spun off excellent to spectacular results.

All pyramid researchers ignored the full apex angles of the ancient pyramids.

I ferreted them all out in ancient and modern geometires,

and applied a plethora of harmonic code testing to them.

In Harmonic Code,

you can pin down almost any number with a -- code formula,

using a variety of universal constants etc etc.

The most studied number along side Pi, would be the Fine Structure Constant, -- FSC,

set at 137.0359991,

and along with all that goes the Kabbalah 137 associations.

I think this is the pdf by James Gilson on the FSC:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication...e_Constant

I got ten decimal accuracy many times in equations for 137.0359991,

but it didn't have nuclear magnetic resoanance experiemental data.

but it did have Pi, and a whole lotta ice cream.

...

Quote:The speed of light in the metric system appears in the design of the Great Pyramid,

when the decimal point is slided along the value.

Well obviously, but that latitude mark isn't on the pyramid apex,

and may be located on something in the interior,

and not necessarily to the video's Grand Gallery choice at all.

The exact King's Chamber latitude would be interesting.

The latitude of the pyramid apex,

so close to being aligned to the speed of light number cannot be a coincidence.

the apex at

29.979233333 degrees in google ... statistically is close enough at about 99.99996 %.

That well exceeds six sigma accuracy.

That is not what is in question.

The video error was in the assigned distance of Pi or 3.141592654 km,

from 30 degree north down to the pyramid.

The distance is about 2.304 km.

Due to that, it now would be excellent to know the exact distances from 30 degrees north,

to the apex and King's Chamber etc.

-----------------------------------

The arrangement of cubit system image diagrams that were posted,

were to show that researchers have to view the Giza pyramids from a perspective of CUBITS,

and multiple interwoven cubit systems,

revolving around a plethora of their cultural cosmological math sciences.

We know they used them,

and they had a large variety of them.

It isn't too difficult to ferret out the highest statistical cubit choices available.

All ancient cubits are available as common simple fractions,

and many have simple replicating decimal sequences.

here are a few,

with heights in 280 cubits

20.628 571428 571428 ~ ---- 481.33333 foot height

20.62643239 = 648000 / 31416 = 8100 / 3927

20.625 --- 481.25 foot height

20.620 285714 285714~ --- 481.14 foot height

20.6189781 = 28248 / 1370 <---

20.618 18 18 18~

20.6171785

20.61675

20.614 285714 285714~ ---- 481 foot height

20.61 --- 480.9 height -- {3 x 687 Mars calendar count sidereal = 2061}

20.606060606~ --- = 68 / 33 --- 480.80 80 80~ height

Pi and square root two related cubits have infinite random decimal patterns,

but can be made into highly convergent fractions which can have 10 decimal accuracy.

Pi cubits

20.62648062

20.61670179

sqrt 2 cubits

20.61923374

20.62394778 = 262.5 / {9 x sqrt2}

Though I stated earlier that mathematically 20.625 had an edge for royal cubit,

my choice is simply to the straight forward 756 foot base length = 9072 inches.

for cubit 1134 / 55 = 20.618 18 18~.

Cubit 20.625 would be easiest to work with, and makes a lot of sense,

especially from a modern perspective,

and was the premier choice of the early Petrie enthusiasts.

Though Petrie originally set the Royal Cubit spread at 20.615 to 20.624,

prior to publishing he edged the spread to:

20.615 to 20.625 inches

for the Royal Cubit,

from King's Chamber measurements.

That spread for Royal Cubit would exclude Pi cubit 20.62648062,

but would include Pi cubit 20.61670179.

If I have to make a top 5 choices, I will keep them in the Petrie spread.

20.618 18 18 18~

20.625

20.61675

20.61670179 pi cubit

20.61923374 sqrt 2 cubit

thus preferring the ancient cubits over the pure modern ones seen.

Any of the above 5 choices can have volumes of valid mathematical evidences to back them.

For my analysis of planetary timeline cycles,

the 756 foot base length,

and the {4 / aPi} = {14 / 11} slope tangent geometry of 440 cubit base and 280 cubit height pyramid,

spun off excellent to spectacular results.

All pyramid researchers ignored the full apex angles of the ancient pyramids.

I ferreted them all out in ancient and modern geometires,

and applied a plethora of harmonic code testing to them.

In Harmonic Code,

you can pin down almost any number with a -- code formula,

using a variety of universal constants etc etc.

The most studied number along side Pi, would be the Fine Structure Constant, -- FSC,

set at 137.0359991,

and along with all that goes the Kabbalah 137 associations.

I think this is the pdf by James Gilson on the FSC:

https://www.researchgate.net/publication...e_Constant

Quote:An introductory review of the origins of the fine structure constant problem

and some of its historical connections to angular momenta

in Maxwell's electro- magnetic theory

and to Planck's frequency to energy conversion factor h.

Three formulae that give accurate values of the fine structure constant are briefly examined

and one probabilistic procedure based on the Combinatorial Hierarchy

that leads to an accurate value is also discussed.

Then follows a refinement of analysis used by the present author

in deriving a formula for the fine structure constant.

The error in the value deduced earlier in relation to the experimentally obtained value

was approximately two parts in one thousand million.

The refinements reduce this error to approximately two parts in one hundred thousand million.

The scheme used is called wave snapping.

It involves an analysis of how a trapped wave can be bent to fit along the orbit it is following.

A wave element held trapped in an orbit can be considered to be able to bend continuously

with infinite snapping points so as to lie along a curved orbit

or it can snap into a discrete number of linear sections so as to make a best fit to the orbit curvature.

A brittleness quantum number Nb

relating to the number of snaps in a constrained wave is introduced.

A formula involving the integers N = 137

and Nb = 25

is derived giving a value for the fine structure constant near the center of the bounds

obtained by nuclear magnetic resonance experiments

I got ten decimal accuracy many times in equations for 137.0359991,

but it didn't have nuclear magnetic resoanance experiemental data.

but it did have Pi, and a whole lotta ice cream.

...