09-21-2017, 02:13 PM

...

Note: 6.8 sigma accuracy in the equation at bottom of image <---

that is:

0.058 ppm error

So, here it is.

NOTE:

the angle tangents {100 / 360} and {100 / 338}

acquire

the 15.5 and 16.5 degree angles.

However,

The assumptions made by resaerchers fail to recognize this:

Those angles may have been measured from a different perspective by the Teotihuacans.

Think triangles in geometry

{100 / 360} as a tangent -- has the complimentary tangent {360 / 100},

One is 15.524111 degrees,

the other is:

90 minus 15.524111 degrees <----> with tangent {360 / 100} = 3.6

360 ---> 3.6 angle tangent

338 ---> 3.38 angle tangent

The MATH can be done BOTH ways and obtain the exact same results!

The Lunar Month cycle seen at the bottom of the image is a world record

in Lunar Month cycles.

Statistically speaking, it is impossible,

for all this math and geometry to be any form of coincidence or random chance.

The accuracy seen in the last equation at the bottom of the image is:

0.999999942 ---> seven 9's there! -- 6.8 sigma accuracy !

That is as absolutely close that a planetary timeline cycle,

using NASA and 21st century refined data <---

can possible converge to.

Note: 6.8 sigma accuracy in the equation at bottom of image <---

that is:

0.058 ppm error

So, here it is.

NOTE:

the angle tangents {100 / 360} and {100 / 338}

acquire

the 15.5 and 16.5 degree angles.

However,

The assumptions made by resaerchers fail to recognize this:

Those angles may have been measured from a different perspective by the Teotihuacans.

Think triangles in geometry

{100 / 360} as a tangent -- has the complimentary tangent {360 / 100},

One is 15.524111 degrees,

the other is:

90 minus 15.524111 degrees <----> with tangent {360 / 100} = 3.6

360 ---> 3.6 angle tangent

338 ---> 3.38 angle tangent

The MATH can be done BOTH ways and obtain the exact same results!

The Lunar Month cycle seen at the bottom of the image is a world record

in Lunar Month cycles.

Statistically speaking, it is impossible,

for all this math and geometry to be any form of coincidence or random chance.

The accuracy seen in the last equation at the bottom of the image is:

0.999999942 ---> seven 9's there! -- 6.8 sigma accuracy !

That is as absolutely close that a planetary timeline cycle,

using NASA and 21st century refined data <---

can possible converge to.