...

Often you see conversions in the ancient math,

in which day counts are aligned as inches or feet,

ie

the days,

are often assigned as a direct connection to the measure of feet in the base length.

Or the conversion uses a cubit in inches,

and once it is converted,

this may result in a number that is ---> ASSIGNED ---> as feet.

So from my last post with the new cubit,

that is now aligned with the Pi cubit 20.61670179:

You see a cubit in inches --- tied to the Venus sidereal in days {or the base length in feet},

---> which results:

in megalithic yards of 2.72 feet.

When doing this type of harmonic code in ancient math,

you simply ignore all the measurements of units,

because the ancient number systems work in such a way as to facilitate measure counts,

that will align objectives such as days with feet etc etc etc.

I don't want to hear any resistance to that.

Don't forget --- modern physicists use the Fine Structure Constant <---

137.0359991

and it has ---> NO UNITS of measure, but it is full Pi in all their calculations.

So the same essential processing is involved in ancient code.

Often one or two simple steps are automatically bypassed,

let's say in a conversion from inches to feet.

You simply have to recognize the CONVERGENT result.

I am using the half base length ---> 378 feet <---

So I can rewrite the equations as such,

simply displaying the cubit seen,

with it's equivalent in feet:

cubit 20.61435453 inches = 1.717862878 feet

1.717862878 feet x Pi x 378 = 2040 = 750 x 2.72 feet Megalithic yard

Hopefully that helps those that cannot fathom how to bypass units of measure,

in initial extrapolations of the Pyramid Pi Cubit System Code <---

It works.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Hancock's math and numbers are very similar to mine.

We essentially agree on a lot of the particulars.

All he needs to do is be more stringent in his final calculations,

and

DON"T ROUND OFF,

like he did in his Menkaure Pyramid height -- he botched that badly.

or

in his earlier presentations,

he equates 4 / Pi with 4 / aPi.

When you round off like that for convenience as Hancock did:

481.09 09 09 09 09 09 09 feet = 5773.09 09 09 09 09 09 inches = {63504 / 11} inches

for the Khufu pyramid height,

down to

481.09 ---> Hancock's rounding off figure to calculate the Menkaure Pyramid height

well then ALL your later conversions are off.

And that is why his Menkaure Pyramid height is botched

and I had it right back in 2009:

213.81 81 81 81 81 81 81 feet <----> = {2352 / 11} inches

and the reason Hancock and almost 99% of the rest of the researchers,

cannot follow suit and provide proper calculations,

is because:

none of them ---> Know How to Convert Decimals to Fractions

I do not enjoy correcting everybody's math. I have to do it all the time.

So if I pursue their -- endless -- extrapolations,

I have to redo ALL their math from beginning to end,

because they often botched the starting math.

Everybody makes an occasional clerical error,

after looking at endless numbers --- you go blind,

and as such,

often a fraction is inadvertantly written as the inverse fraction,

or a 9 decimal number is supplied,

because you inadvertantly left out the 6th decimal placement,

because you are going blind,

looking at a universe of numbers --- and you burn out

Hancock and most of the researchers --- round off often -- for inexpicable reasons,

because

they don't want to have to explain ---> each and every fucking intricacy,

of the actual fractions tied to the decimals.

Just about everyone except for me.

Richard of old HM days, always did his math to the precise calculations and presented those.

How to Convert Decimals to Fractions

you have to learn how to do it,

otherwise when you have a sine and cosine or a tangent,

all you have is a meaningless set of decimals,

when the code,

is actually almost always spelled out in the fractions.

The cosine of pentagonal 72 degrees = 0.309016994 --- --- wtf?

That is fraction:

{1 / 2Phi} --- now it makes sense.

I remember going up to the geometry dept. here at the university back in 2008.

I needed a grad student to check my geometry math at the time.

The dept. head there gave me his best grad student.

I gave her a diagram,

with the fractions inside the square roots.

She had never seen anything like it.

All university geometry students don't have a clueburger to fry ferreting out the fractions.

They are not taught to recognize the fractions,

within the square roots.

All they know how to do,

is copy the decimal from their calculator,

and supply that as an answer on a test question,

but do not have a clue,

what the fractions are.

Like this:

tangent of 30 degrees = 0.577350269 = the square root of {1 / 3}

OK,

a more complex target to show how this is done.

Khafre pyramid slope tangent = 4 /3 = 1.33333333333~

In the tetrahedral oriented pyramids that I developed,

one particularly significant angle has that tangent:

square root of {4 / 3} = 1.154700538 = tangent for 49.10660535 degrees.

now

find the cosine and sine <----

cosine = 0.6546536721 --- wtf? ----> square root {3 / 7} -- now it makes sense!

look at that fraction now ---> OUTSIDE the square root.

{3 / 7} x pyramid height 481.25 -- feet = 100 cubits of 20.625 inches.

Immediately, feet were converted to inches AUTOMATICALLY,

and 20.625 inches ---> is the correct cubit ---> used to attain 481.25 feet.

{3 / 7} x pyramid height 481.09 09 09 09~ feet = 100 cubits of 20.618 18 18~

and

20.618 18 18~ is the correct cubit to attain hieght 481.09 09 09 feet.

Now look at the sine:

sqaure root {4 / 7} = 0.755928946 --- oh my --- x 1000 = 755.928946 feet

which equals,

440 x cubit 20.61624398 = 9071.147352 inches

which means that:

a cubit is now generated in the Khufu Pyramid base length,

which will convert directly back into the original angle tangent ---> square root {4 / 3}.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Or simply take the tangent:

of 30 degrees,

square root {1 / 3} = 0.5773502692 ---> x 10000 = HEIGHT ---> 5773.502692 inches <----

5773.502692 inches = 280 cubits of 20.61965247 inches

find the base length using the Khufu Pyramid formula:

440 cubits x 20.61965247 inches = 9072.647087 inches,

---> what the fuck

---> does that equal?

9072.647087 inches = 10000 x {aPi / 2} x square root 3 <---

lol

edit .... clerical error:

9072.647087 inches = 10000 x {aPi / 2} -- divided by -- square root 3 <---

Bingo.

And that is how it is done right.

....

Often you see conversions in the ancient math,

in which day counts are aligned as inches or feet,

ie

the days,

are often assigned as a direct connection to the measure of feet in the base length.

Or the conversion uses a cubit in inches,

and once it is converted,

this may result in a number that is ---> ASSIGNED ---> as feet.

So from my last post with the new cubit,

that is now aligned with the Pi cubit 20.61670179:

Quote:20.61435453 x Pi x 224.7 = 14552 = 5350 x 2.72 Megalithic yard

20.60 60 60~ x aPi x 224.7 = 14552 = 5350 x 2.72 Megalithic yard

You see a cubit in inches --- tied to the Venus sidereal in days {or the base length in feet},

---> which results:

in megalithic yards of 2.72 feet.

When doing this type of harmonic code in ancient math,

you simply ignore all the measurements of units,

because the ancient number systems work in such a way as to facilitate measure counts,

that will align objectives such as days with feet etc etc etc.

I don't want to hear any resistance to that.

Don't forget --- modern physicists use the Fine Structure Constant <---

137.0359991

and it has ---> NO UNITS of measure, but it is full Pi in all their calculations.

So the same essential processing is involved in ancient code.

Often one or two simple steps are automatically bypassed,

let's say in a conversion from inches to feet.

You simply have to recognize the CONVERGENT result.

I am using the half base length ---> 378 feet <---

So I can rewrite the equations as such,

simply displaying the cubit seen,

with it's equivalent in feet:

Quote:20.61435453 x Pi x 378 = 24480 = 9000 x 2.72 Megalithic yard

cubit 20.61435453 inches = 1.717862878 feet

1.717862878 feet x Pi x 378 = 2040 = 750 x 2.72 feet Megalithic yard

Hopefully that helps those that cannot fathom how to bypass units of measure,

in initial extrapolations of the Pyramid Pi Cubit System Code <---

It works.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Hancock's math and numbers are very similar to mine.

We essentially agree on a lot of the particulars.

All he needs to do is be more stringent in his final calculations,

and

DON"T ROUND OFF,

like he did in his Menkaure Pyramid height -- he botched that badly.

or

in his earlier presentations,

he equates 4 / Pi with 4 / aPi.

When you round off like that for convenience as Hancock did:

481.09 09 09 09 09 09 09 feet = 5773.09 09 09 09 09 09 inches = {63504 / 11} inches

for the Khufu pyramid height,

down to

481.09 ---> Hancock's rounding off figure to calculate the Menkaure Pyramid height

well then ALL your later conversions are off.

And that is why his Menkaure Pyramid height is botched

and I had it right back in 2009:

213.81 81 81 81 81 81 81 feet <----> = {2352 / 11} inches

and the reason Hancock and almost 99% of the rest of the researchers,

cannot follow suit and provide proper calculations,

is because:

none of them ---> Know How to Convert Decimals to Fractions

I do not enjoy correcting everybody's math. I have to do it all the time.

So if I pursue their -- endless -- extrapolations,

I have to redo ALL their math from beginning to end,

because they often botched the starting math.

Everybody makes an occasional clerical error,

after looking at endless numbers --- you go blind,

and as such,

often a fraction is inadvertantly written as the inverse fraction,

or a 9 decimal number is supplied,

because you inadvertantly left out the 6th decimal placement,

because you are going blind,

looking at a universe of numbers --- and you burn out

Hancock and most of the researchers --- round off often -- for inexpicable reasons,

because

they don't want to have to explain ---> each and every fucking intricacy,

of the actual fractions tied to the decimals.

Just about everyone except for me.

Richard of old HM days, always did his math to the precise calculations and presented those.

How to Convert Decimals to Fractions

you have to learn how to do it,

otherwise when you have a sine and cosine or a tangent,

all you have is a meaningless set of decimals,

when the code,

is actually almost always spelled out in the fractions.

The cosine of pentagonal 72 degrees = 0.309016994 --- --- wtf?

That is fraction:

{1 / 2Phi} --- now it makes sense.

I remember going up to the geometry dept. here at the university back in 2008.

I needed a grad student to check my geometry math at the time.

The dept. head there gave me his best grad student.

I gave her a diagram,

with the fractions inside the square roots.

She had never seen anything like it.

All university geometry students don't have a clueburger to fry ferreting out the fractions.

They are not taught to recognize the fractions,

within the square roots.

All they know how to do,

is copy the decimal from their calculator,

and supply that as an answer on a test question,

but do not have a clue,

what the fractions are.

Like this:

tangent of 30 degrees = 0.577350269 = the square root of {1 / 3}

OK,

a more complex target to show how this is done.

Khafre pyramid slope tangent = 4 /3 = 1.33333333333~

In the tetrahedral oriented pyramids that I developed,

one particularly significant angle has that tangent:

square root of {4 / 3} = 1.154700538 = tangent for 49.10660535 degrees.

now

find the cosine and sine <----

cosine = 0.6546536721 --- wtf? ----> square root {3 / 7} -- now it makes sense!

look at that fraction now ---> OUTSIDE the square root.

{3 / 7} x pyramid height 481.25 -- feet = 100 cubits of 20.625 inches.

Immediately, feet were converted to inches AUTOMATICALLY,

and 20.625 inches ---> is the correct cubit ---> used to attain 481.25 feet.

{3 / 7} x pyramid height 481.09 09 09 09~ feet = 100 cubits of 20.618 18 18~

and

20.618 18 18~ is the correct cubit to attain hieght 481.09 09 09 feet.

Now look at the sine:

sqaure root {4 / 7} = 0.755928946 --- oh my --- x 1000 = 755.928946 feet

which equals,

440 x cubit 20.61624398 = 9071.147352 inches

which means that:

a cubit is now generated in the Khufu Pyramid base length,

which will convert directly back into the original angle tangent ---> square root {4 / 3}.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Or simply take the tangent:

of 30 degrees,

square root {1 / 3} = 0.5773502692 ---> x 10000 = HEIGHT ---> 5773.502692 inches <----

5773.502692 inches = 280 cubits of 20.61965247 inches

find the base length using the Khufu Pyramid formula:

440 cubits x 20.61965247 inches = 9072.647087 inches,

---> what the fuck

---> does that equal?

9072.647087 inches = 10000 x {aPi / 2} x square root 3 <---

lol

edit .... clerical error:

9072.647087 inches = 10000 x {aPi / 2} -- divided by -- square root 3 <---

Bingo.

And that is how it is done right.

....