Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The Great Pyramid
cubits .... arm lengths ... one arm was 20.618 18 18~ inches,
the other one was, 
20.625 inches

20.618 18 18~  x 20.625  =  425.25

pi cubits
20.61670179  x  20.62648062  =  425.25

No, I don't adhere to modern western university driven histories of mankind,
or mumbo jumbo they think they measure in timelines,
from computer models.

I am trying to facilitate a PROCESS FLOW with:
The Megalithic Yard -- the most ancient measurement method of ancient constructs,
far preceding Giza.

I suggest to readers to review my last two posts in particular.


An Ancient Math and Geometry Lesson

What do you see when you see pyramids on Mars?
Many enormous constructs.
The D & M in Cydonia for example.
Megalithic Mars pyramids.

What preceded the ancient pyramids on Earth,
such as the Khufu and Khafre pyramids?
Enormous Megalithic blocks have been found.

The Megalithic Yard  =  2.72 feet  =  32.64 inches.
That is the most ancient version of the megalithic yard.
It aligns with ancient Pi value 3.1416.

314160  /  272  =  1155
It also aligns in the ancient -- Mars sidereal and Earth-Venus synod equation,
Mars sidereal = 687 days
Venus synod to Earth = 583.95 days

272  x  687  Mars sidereal=  320  x  583.95 day Earth - Venus synod
or simply:
17  x  687  =  583.95  x  20 ------ NASA 686.98 Mars ---- 583.92  Venus synod NASA

Many years ago I discovered the rectangle with the two lengths:
756 feet -- Khufu Pyramid
1360 feet -- 500 megalithic yards  ---  2.72 feet = MY Whip

The ABSOLUTE BEAUTY of this rectangle is that the diagonal <---
is exactly  1556  feet <---
Try and find another rectangle drawn from ancient constructs,
that produces a -- whole number <---
for the diagonal length !
You won't have any luck.

I then realized ... looking back at the recently discovered -- Babylonian clay tablet,
designed with numbers to produce -- square root 2,
{Look back here in this thread at my work on this clay tablet -- I expanded that with spectacular results}
I then realized that my rectangle:
1360 feet
756 feet
is a true and superb -- math lesson -- for ancient students.

You simply can apply ANY Khufu Pyramid height <----
of any known cubit application <---
and a standard formula emerges with the Megalithic Yard.

The spectacular nature of this rectangle to the ancient master and student,
is that it teaches the student,
how to use Convergence Dynamics <---
to isolate square root 2 <---
Phi --- and square root phi <---

It also creates a spectacular equation for the --- Earth Tropical Year  !!!

Now, out of ... nowhere ... it also produces a Convergence Dynamic,
for the:
Cydonia City Grid Angle <---> Carlotto's 33.3 degrees Smoke
the Earth Tropical Year  at 365.2422 157 days  --- NASA -- 365.2422 days
The tropical year is the period of time required by the sun 
to pass from vernal equinox to vernal equinox. 
It is equal to 365 days, 5 hours, 48 minutes, and 46 seconds, 
or 365.2422 days.

Now review the image.

The Cydonia City Grid equations I have produced,
may indeed be:
Coinci-Code Hi  ... Coincidental Code with almost unbelieveably incredible convergency results!
but then ...
just what happened on ... Megalithic Mars?
They measured their pyramids with the same accuracy and precision constructs,
as what is seen at Giza in the Khufu and Khafre Pyramids.
The City Grid angle has to have a meaningful equation.

My image work -- Grand Unification of Ancient and Modern Mathematics and Geometry 
At the very least,
my simple rectangle is an ancient math lesson -- that teaches the student,
almost everything about cubits and pyramids and universal constants -- pi , phi, and sqrt 2 Whip

[Image: JWxxpuU.jpg]




PS ... you can also use the Mars sidereal 686.98 days in the City Grid equation.
It will give you a:
51.02078252 degree -- Menkaure Pyramid style -- 51 degree angle -- 
within the Petrie framework of possible angles.


Quote:The most curious development of -- cubits -- I am on the fence as to it's origin.
cubit 20.625 is the most useful and versatile of the batch ... from our perspective.

This is fun

Semimajor axis (106 km)
Earth 149.60  Mars 227.92
                  1 : 1.524 = ~33.3 degree angle.
                 Meter =1m : Royal Cubit ~.524 m

Mars Sidereal orbit period (days) 686.980 / 33.3 = 20.63003003003003 inch cubit

Mars Tropical orbit period (days) 686.973 / 33.3 = 20.62981981981982 inch cubit

686.980 / 33.33333333333333333333= 20.6094 inch cubit
686.973 / 33.33333333333333333333= 20.60919 inch cubit

Hold on – the ancient Egyptians may have known about the metre, but surely they didn’t know about the second? Perhaps they did. The length of two sides of the base of the Great Pyramid is the distance a point on the equator moves through space in exactly one second.
I’m sure if you tried hard enough, the Great Pyramid may be found to contain some mathematics that support imperial measures, even though things like the foot and inch were not anywhere near close to existence 4500 years ago, and anyway are promoted as being based on human properties, not mathematical ones. But there is one thing that really does indicate that the ancient Egyptians were very familiar with the metre. I mentioned early on in this article that the cubit, which was used to build the Great Pyramid (each side has a length of 440 cubits), was 0.524 m long, an apparently odd relationship to the metre. Let us however look at three equations:

Quote:Mars Mean Orbital Elements (J2000)

Semimajor axis (AU)

Earth 1 : Mars  1.52366231

  • One sixth of pi is 0.5236 – to all intents and purposes exactly the length of the cubit in metres (to within 0.4 mm of the known physical example,(of the cubit) and even that assumes that this example’s stated length has not been rounded to three decimal places); quite why one sixth is not clear, but the Great Pyramid is located exactly 30° above the equator – i.e. one sixth of the distance between the two poles.
  • One fifth of ?² (2.618) = 0.5236 – again, exactly the length of the cubit in metres. There are five increments of 72° in a circle of 360°. It is known that the earth wobbles slightly on its axis, at the rate of 1° every 72 years.
  • ? – ?² (3.1416 – 2.618) = 0.5236 – another relationship that yields the length of the cubit in metres, and ties together, by means of the cubit (and hence the metre), the two constants that are embedded in the Great Pyramid’s mathematical properties

Mars Math Arrow

Quote:PHI: The Divine Ratio - David Yarrow
THE SPIN VORTEX: double PHI spirals, Life's Archetypal Architecture PHI ... Make a rectangle ABCD with sides in PHI ratio: ... PHI + 1 = PHI2 = 2.618.

Mathematics of Phi, the Golden Number - The Golden Ratio › Math
May 16, 2012 - If you square Phi, you get a number exactly 1 greater than itself: 2.618…, or. Φ² = Φ + 1. If you divide Phi into 1 to get its reciprocal, you get a ...
Doh maybe the cubit is mars based?
Along the vines of the Vineyard.
With a forked tongue the snake singsss...

This doesn't work with ancient cubits, using the grid angle:

Quote:Mars Sidereal orbit period (days) 686.980 / 33.3 = 20.63003003003003 inch cubit   Naughty

and if you want to use your "semimajor axis"  material
you need to do this:

Semimajor axis (AU)
{Earth  -- divided by -- Mars  1.52366231}  =  33.27742721  degrees

now go back to your equation in the above quote and apply the new angle.

your resultant cubit would be   20.644002382   Nonono

this does work -- in ancient cubits -- and it is the only way to align the cubits properly:

Quote:686.980 / 33.33333333333333333333= 20.6094 inch cubit   Hi

687.5 / 33.3333333333 = 20.625 cubit

Petrie Royal Cubit  -- 20.615 to 20.625 inches    Holycowsmile

then you can legitimately work within Khufu Pyramid base lengths and heights ...

This material you posted ... I saw it on FB and it was just as bad there,
as it unfortunately appears here:
Quote:One sixth of pi is 0.5236 –
to all intents and purposes {monkey see and monkey poo}
exactly the length
of the 
cubit   in metres : Doh

(to within 0.4 mm of 
the known physical example,(of the cubit)  Horsepoop
0.524 ---- cubit 20.62992129

Pi is Pi.
not 3.1416
The Egyptians understood both values very distinctly and from specific perspectives.

The pyramid was measured in FEET and INCHES, not meters.
These fucking idiots don't have a clue to chew on.

This is why the entire genre of ancient "sacred geometry" eventually gets laughed at.
Too much garbage to sift through where anything precise slipped down the drain,
before they printed one word in their link.
The premise is that ---> 0.5236 meters ---> is the royal cubit.
Clowns don't even know what a metric to inch conversion is.

conversion factor:
3.2808399 feet / meter

the math result:  20.61417326  inches  = epic fail = 0.5236 meters


Quote:3.1416 – 2.618 = 0.5236 – another relationship that yields the length of the cubit in metres

The cubit that converts from 0.5236 meters,
has nothing to do with Pi value 3.1416.

The primary cubit that works with 3.1416:
20.61675 ----   =  3.1416  x  6.5625
20.61670179     = Pi  x  6.5625   {pi cubit}
20.625            =  aPi  x 6.5625  ---------------  aPi = 22 / 7

take it or leave it,
I have explained it too many times here already.
That link was a poor selection to post.

Cubit table:
pi cubit -- 20.61670179 --- 0.523664225  ----- 20.61670179 = 6.5625 Pi
3.1416 cubit -- 20.61675 -- 0.523665449 ------ 20.61675      = 6.5625  x  3.1416 

suddenly the math does not work:
Quote:the 3.1416 pi value --- and 20.61675 cubit --- 0.523665449  meters
2.618  plus  0.523665449  =  3.141665449    Pennywise
you can use his number,
the correct way --- using true ---> phi squared:

2.618033989  plus  0.5236  =  3.141633989   Pennywise

They round off into meaningless blather in that link, essentially,
and that is a common affliction in many ancient "sacred geometry" links.
They have no idea of what 3.1416 really is.

Pi ... is a pipe dream in their PennyWeisenheimer kids ... clown cartoon.

You have to be as specific ---> as the ancient Egyptian Intent 
when they did the original math and pyramid construction.

Cubit table:         meters
20.618 18 18~ -- 0.523701817   ---- 756 foot base length  <---
20.61923374~ -- 0.523728536  ---- square root 2 cubit
20.625   --------- 0.523874999  <----

Petrie Royal cubit average:
20.62   ----  0.523747999   meters

You can run a clean shop, or you can run a lot of slop Whip

never worked for Egyptian cultural math sciences that built the Khufu and Khafre Pyramids.
never worked for the alien tic tac technology,
that led the Navy pilots on an Easter egg hunt over the Pacific off the coast of Mexico.
never worked for the technology that keeps the Rovers running on Mars.

Shop-n-Slop ... is a Walmart with a McDonalds in Pyongyang, North Korea.

And then God dropped in to ask Pennywise at the Shop-n-Slop in Pyongyang,
"Is you shopping cart half full or half empty?"
And Pennywise, grinning with a toothy smile,
"depends on how many cubits ... half full ... opposed to ... half empty is",
and God watched silently,
though a bit sadly,
as Pennywise strolled away on his roller skates with his half full Shop-n-Slop cart,
on his way to pay a visit to Little Rocket Man.

(06-14-2018, 04:24 AM)?Vianova Wrote:
This doesn't work with ancient cubits, using the grid angle:

Quote:Mars Sidereal orbit period (days) 686.980 / 33.3 = 20.63003003003003 inch cubit   Naughty
Oh, I never wrote 686.980 / 33.3 Arrow Degrees =   I guess I can't type my actions sorry for confusion.

That is just a plain old calculator that is an accessory on "MS-Windows".
I keyed in 686.980 / 33.3 = 20.63003003003003
That is not an ANGLE , itz just a number no Carlotto involved.

and if you want to use your "semimajor axis"  material
you need to do this:
Semimajor axis (AU)
arctangent: {Earth  -- divided by -- Mars  1.52366231}  =  33.27742721  degrees

now go back to your equation in the above quote and apply the new angle.(Angle not intended,measure intent-EA)

your resultant cubit would be   20.644002382 


I am trying to facilitate a PROCESS FLOW with:
The Megalithic Yard -- the most ancient measurement method of ancient constructs,
far preceding Giza.
So even though wiki says:
The ancient Egyptian royal cubit (meh niswt) Arrow is the earliest attested standard measure...

I’m sure if you tried hard enough, the Great Pyramid may be found to contain some mathematics that support imperial measures, even though things like the foot and inch were not anywhere near close to existence 4500 years ago, and anyway are promoted as being based on human properties, not mathematical ones

...a more ancient megalthic yards given inches/days 
Banana_hump begat mars cubits feet first later...
process flow 1 inch = 1 day

Mars Sidereal orbit period (inches=days) 686.980 / 33.3 = 20.63003003003003 inch cubit

Mars Tropical orbit period (inches=days) 686.973 / 33.3 = 20.62981981981982 inch cubit

686.980 day-inch / 33.33333333333333*= 20.6094 inch cubit
686.973 day-inch / 33.33333333333333*= 20.60919 inch cubit
/ 33.33333333333333*
* asterix denotes my calculator can only compute a certain amount of 3'sss... lol.

Thanx for that angle Arrow 

Semimajor axis (AU)
arctangent: {Earth  -- divided by -- Mars  1.52366231}  =  33.27742721  degrees
Along the vines of the Vineyard.
With a forked tongue the snake singsss...

Quote:I am trying to facilitate a PROCESS FLOW with:
The Megalithic Yard -- the most ancient measurement method of ancient constructs,
far preceding Giza.


Megalithic Yard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
A Megalithic Yard (MY) is a unit of measurement of about 2.72 feet (0.83 m),[1][2][3] that some researchers believe was used in the construction of megalithic structures. The proposal was made by Alexander Thom as a result of his surveys of 600 megalithic sites in England, Scotland, Wales and Brittany.[4] Thom also proposed the Megalithic Rod of 2.5 MY.[5] As subunits of these, he further proposed the Megalithic Inch of 2.073 centimetres (0.816 in), one hundred of which are included in a Megalithic Rod, and forty of which composed a Meglithic Yard. Thom applied the statistical lumped variance test of J.R. Broadbent[6] on this quantum and found the results significant,[7] while others have challenged his statistical analysis and suggested that Thom's evidence can be explained in other ways, for instance that the supposed megalithic yard is in fact the average length of a pace.
Contents Other units
Thom suggested that "There must have been a headquarters from which standard rods were sent out but whether this was in these islands or on the Continent the present investigation cannot determine."[8]
Margaret Ponting has suggested that artefacts such as a marked bone found during excavations at Dail Mòr near Callanish, the Patrickholme bone bead from Lanarkshire and Dalgety bone bead from Fife in Scotland have shown some evidence of being measuring rods based on the Megalithic Yard in Britain.[9] An oak rod from the Iron Age fortified settlement at Borre Fen mearured 53.15 inches (135.0 cm) with marks dividing it up into eight parts of 6.64 inches (16.9 cm). Euan Mackie referred to five eighths of this rod 33.2 inches (84 cm) as "very close to a megalithic yard".[10] A hazel measuring rod recovered from a Bronze Age burial mound in Borum Eshøj, East Jutland by P. V. Glob in 1875 measured 30.9 inches (78 cm). Keith Critchlow suggested this may have shrunk 0.63 inches (1.6 cm) from its original length of one Megalithic Yard over a period of 3000 years.[11]
Thom made a comparison of his Megalithic Yard with the Spanish vara, the pre-metric measurement of Iberia, whose length was 2.7425 feet (0.8359 m). Archaeologist Euan Mackie noticed similarities between the Megalithic Yard and a unit of measurement extrapolated from a long, marked shell from Mohenjo Daro and ancient measuring rods used in mining in the Austrian Tyrol.[12] He suggested similarities with other measurements such as the ancient Indian gaz and the Sumerian šu-du3-a.[12] Along with John Michell, Mackie also noted that it is the diagonal of a rectangle measuring 2 by 1 Egyptian remens.[13][14][verification needed] Jay Kappraff has noted similarity between the Megalithic Yard and the ancient Indus short yard of 33 inches (0.84 m).[15] Anne Macaulay[16] reported that the Megalithic Rod is equal in length to the Greek fathom of (2.072 metres (6.80 ft))[15] from studies by Eric Fernie of the Metrological Relief in the Ashmolean Museum, Oxford.[17]
Thom's proposals were initially ignored or regarded as unbelievable by mainstream archaeologists.[18]
Clive Ruggles, citing astronomer Douglas C. Heggie, has said that both classical and Bayesian statistical reassessments of Thom's data "reached the conclusion that the evidence in favour of the MY was at best marginal, and that even if it does exist the uncertainty in our knowledge of its value is of the order of centimetres, far greater than the 1mm precision claimed by Thom. In other words, the evidence presented by Thom could be adequately explained by, say, monuments being set out by pacing, with the 'unit' reflecting an average length of pace."[19] David George Kendall makes the same argument,[7] and says that pacing would have created a greater difference in measurements between sites, and that a statistical analysis of sites would reveal whether they were measured by pacing or not. In an investigation for the Royal Academy Kendall concluded that there was evidence of a uniform unit in Scottish circles but not in English circles, and that further research was needed.[20][21] Statistician P. R. Freeman reached similar conclusions and found that two other units fit the data as well as the yard.[22]

The Megalithic Yard -- the most ancient measurement method of ancient constructs,

far preceding Giza.
Sheep...for instance that the supposed megalithic yard is in fact>>>
the average length of a pace.

A pace is a unit of length consisting either of one normal walking step (~0.75 m), or of a double step, returning to the same foot (~1.5 m). Like other traditional measurements, paces started as informal units but have since been standardized, often with the specific length set according to a typical brisk or military marching stride.
In the US, it is an uncommon customary unit of length denoting a brisk single step and equal to 2 1⁄2 feet or 30.0 inches or 76.2 centimetres.[1][2] Pace also refers to the inverse unit of speed, used mainly for walking and running. The most common pace unit is minutes per mile.[3]
The term "pace" is also used to translate similar formal units in other systems of measurement. Pacing is also used as an informal measure in surveying, with the "pace" equal to two of the surveyor's steps reckoned through comparison with a standard rod or chain.
Contents Other systems
The Roman pace (Latin: passus) was a Roman unit of length. It was notionally the distance of a full stride from the position of one heel where it raised off of the ground to where it set down again at the end of the step: two steps, one by each foot. Under Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa, it was standardized as the distance of two steps (gradūs) or five Roman feet (pedes), about 1.48 meters or 4 feet 10 inches. There were 1000 paces in the Roman mile, which was named after that distance as the mille passus or passuum.
The Byzantine pace (Greek: βήμα, bḗma) was an adaption of the Roman step, a distance of 2½ Greek feet.[6] The double pace (βῆμα διπλοῦν, bḗma diploûn), meanwhile, was similar to the Roman unit, comprising 5 Greek feet.
The Welsh pace (Welsh: cam) was reckoned as 3 Welsh feet of 9 inches and thus may be seen as similar to the English yard: 3 paces made up a leap and 9000 a Welsh mile.

Quote:All things considered:If you have a foot(s) then you set a pace?
...a more ancient megalthic yards given inches/days  [Image: banana_hump.gif] begat mars cubits feet first later...

... A pace is a unit of length consisting either of one normal walking step (~0.75 m), or of a double step, returning to the same foot (~1.5 m)

foot walks yards in a mile of inches   same  Sheep difference   centi- sent a meter @ double-pace

The exact current version of the meter has varied over the centuries.
Now originally there were two proposed methods of discovering a standard unit of measurement;
the first involved a pendulum with a half period of a single second. The alternate idea put forward was to find the length of one quadrant of the Earth's meridian and divide it by 10 million.

The French Academy Of Science opted for the latter due to the fact that gravity can vary ever so slightly depending on where you are on Earth, which would affect the swing of a pendulum and result in a standard, world-wide measurement being impossible to discern.
However, even though a method of deriving the unit was agreed upon in 1791, the exact distance of one quadrant of the Earth's meridian wasn't known at that time. To discover it, two notable French astronomers of the era, Pierre Méchain and Jean-Baptiste Delambre were sent in opposite directions from Paris to work out the length of the Earth's meridian between Dunkirk and Barcelona.
What should have taken the two men little more than a year, actually ended up taking 7 years

Today, the measuring of a meter has come full circle bringing us back to the original discarded suggestion of using time, though we've gotten a bit more advanced than pendulums. Specifically, a meter is defined as being exactly:
Quote:[i]The length of the path travelled by light in vacuum during a time interval of 1/299,792,458 of a second.[/i]
This is a figure that was agreed upon after scientists measured it using something all good science should try to incorporate for maximal awesomeness- lasers.
How does the modern version compare to the original measurements by Méchain and Delambre? It turns out their meter was only off from the modern definition by half a millimeter. Not too shabby.

... A pace is a unit of length consisting either of one normal walking step (~0.75 m), or of a double step, returning to the same foot (~1.5 m)

The foot in motion(pace)becomes meters in action. metaphorically 

If the ancients knew the dimensions of earth then the meter would arise from itz decimal based measure.
while using Sexagesimal (base 60) for pleasure and dozals for foot path and times of leisure.
wether they used the meter or not but kept it as a gaurdian of a gradian treasure?

days Gon by...

Grade (also grad, gradian, gon)
Main article: Grad (angle)
Coordinates were measured in grades on official French terrestrial ordnance charts from the French revolution well into the 20th century. 1 grade (or in modern symbology 1 gon) = 0.9° or 0.01 right angle. One advantage of this measure is that the distance between latitude lines 0.01 gon apart is almost exactly 1 kilometer (and would be exactly 1 km if the original definition of 1 meter = 1⁄10,000,000 quarter-meridian had been adhered to). One disadvantage is that common angles like 30° and 60° are expressed by fractional values
(331⁄3 and 662⁄3 respectively) so this "decimal" unit failed to displace the "sexagesimal" units equilateral-vertex — degree — minute — second invented by Babylonian astronomers.

If the ancients knew the dimension of Earth then more than likely the meter was eventually decimal derived .
Along the vines of the Vineyard.
With a forked tongue the snake singsss...
The prior post info on "the pace" is essentially useless in the discussion.

EA, you should go back and review:
The Ancient Math Lesson,
then you might realize why the Megalithic Yard of 2.72 feet was used, where it was used.
You do not grasp how unique and special that rectangle is.

Megalithic yards probably did vary in different cultures.
The Indus short yard mentioned of 33 inches is a construct of cubit 20.625.
It is also fibonacci in nature.
divided by
33  inches
equals ---------- 0.625  =  5 /  8 =  365 day Earth year / 584 day Venus synod  {ancient cycle}.

The ancient Indus "short yard" of 33 inches
actually could be called:
The Megalithic Yard of 2.75 feet  {12 inch feet}

In that regard both units of measure are competent and real.  {2.72 feet and 2.75 feet}

It depends on which - prime multiple - each culture wants to employ in their "sacred geometry".
2.75 feet
aligns with the 11 multiple  ... 11 x  25  =  275

2.72 feet
applies to the 17 multiple.  17 x 16 = 272
it also aligns the math with ancient Pi value 3.1416 ---- 1155 x 2.72 = 314160
1155 --- of course -- =  56  x 20.625 cubit

The ancient Pi value 3.1416,
thus creates a huge versatility in manipulating important primes:

31416 =  {primes  7  x  11  x  17}  then x  24

note that primes 11 x  17  =  187 <---> 187. 0006134  = {100 Pi x  Phi} / e
e = 2.718281828 {Euler's math constant}

31416 =  187  x 168

Note that 187  and  272   are numbers functioning with 3.1416 <----

allowing decimal shift:
1870  /  2.72  =  687.5 ... divided by 33.33333333~ = 20.625 cubit

Pi value 3.1416 has it's own unique place in the Khufu Pyramid numerological infrastructure.
It also emerges from the ancient Pi progressions.

3.1416 was likely a Pi value of used in earliest Stonehenge era <--- which is why I employ it.
The versatility of the Pi value 3.1416 in that era of cultural numerology,
may be the key as to why 2.72 feet was used there in early Stonehenge influenced England, 
and inherent within the Khufu Pyramid also, due to Pi value 3.1416.

Thom was correct within the framework of his studies of sites in England.
THAT megalithic yard was 2.72 feet,
and both 2.72 and 2.75 as feet in yards,
are utilized in ancient Khufu pyramid math and geometry. 

2.72 feet is the classic ancient Megalithic Yard.
That foot measure is what allows the Ancient Math Lesson {my two posts back},
to facilitate the square root two and square root phi functions in the rectangle.
You cannot replicate that geometry with whole numbers ... using 2.75 feet <---as the MY.

Here is an interesting application of the ancient math:

Khufu Pyramid  -- Apex Angle   {Side Faces}  -- tangent = 14 / 11

Apex Angle tangent:
= 4.106666666~ = 31416 /  7650  =  {1155 x 2.72 MY}  /  765   =   {77  x  2.72 MY}  /  51

Quote:You do not grasp how unique and special that rectangle is.

Not nearly to the extent you understand it in your process flow.

Quote:3.1416 was likely a Pi value of used in earliest Stonehenge era <--- which is why I employ it.
The versatility of the Pi value 3.1416 in that era of cultural numerology,
may be the key as to why 2.72 feet was used there in early Stonehenge influenced England, 
and inherent within the Khufu Pyramid also, due to Pi value 3.1416.

how about this rectangle:

The station stones.

[Image: Stonehenge_Station_Stones.gif]
The henges and pyramids are ancient maps. ... Stones; for these innocent-looking little stones are as complex and as profound as anything that we have looked at Giza. ... Flinders Petrie measured the distance between adjacent Station Stones as 33.15 meters,1 whereas Atkinson's 1978 ... longer 33.3 m between the centers of the stones.2 It is not recorded if Petrie was measuring between the centers of ...
Along the vines of the Vineyard.
With a forked tongue the snake singsss...

I don't see the Stonehenge image you posted at the link you offered.'

Because it isn't there, yet you make it look like it is.
You obviously cannot comprehend 3.1416, and it's placement in the ancient numerology,
or Stonehenge or the Megalithic Yard,
no matter how excruciatuingly it is spelled out for you. 

The link you posted is BULLSHIT  <--- note color red -- in bold print

they state:
52.4 cm is the Royal Cubit ---> according to Petrie <--- they claim,
they then reclarify that as:
page 9 in your link

this is the THIRD TIME you have posted similar BULLSHIT

Both numbers are totally wrong, and Petrie did not state anything that they claim,
about the royal cubit.
Petrie is quite distinctly precise in his statements:

20.615 to 20.625 INCHES  -- Royal Cubit

let's use the lower limit of the Petrie spread :  20.615 inches 

Conversion factor from metric to feet ---- 3.2808399

20.615 inches  =  0.523621  meters

the average:
20.62  inches ---- 0.523748  meters

the above data does not compute in any way shape or form to:
The data in the link.

your link data is ---ROUND OFF data Whip
they first round off to 0.524 meters
0.5235 meters

0.5235 meters ---> cubit 20.61023625

Tell us EA,

where Petrie's Royal Cubit data -- 20.615 to 20.625 inches -- Royal Cubit,
comes anywhere remotely close to:
20.61023625     ????

Yes, Petrie would greatly disagree with the authors at your offered link.

I have done this all for you 3 to 5 times now.
So my only conclusion is that your Intent is to to distract with repetitive bullshit,
because you don't even try to do or check -- any of the math at any of the links you offer,
probably because you are incapable to competently review Whip
the complexity of Petrie's data.

Coming back at you then.


Quote: ... Flinders Petrie measured the distance between adjacent Station Stones as 33.15 meters,
whereas Atkinson's 1978 ... longer33.3 m between the centers of the stones.

OBVIOUSLY Petrie measured BETWEEN the Centers ... you simply have two different measures,
and likely Atkinson was wrong.

And this is the crux of the slop in your math EA.  --- note red bold print ---


Quote:Semimajor axis (AU)
arctangent: {Earth  -- divided by -- Mars  1.52366231}  =  33.27742721  degrees

So is it ... ?

Quote:measured the distance between adjacent Station Stones as 33.15 meters,  {Petrie}
whereas Atkinson's 1978 ... longer33.3 m between the centers of the stones.

or is it ... ?

EA measured the distance between the stones : [b]33.27742721  degrees[/b] meters

Pick one or the fucking other Whip
Cydonia City grid:
Carlotto -- 33.3 degrees 

Cydonia City grid
EA  33.27742721  degrees

What you are essentially saying is that Carlotto as a scientist,
does not know the difference between 33.3 and 33.27742721....  in his overall calculations.
That Carlotto's solstice is not 33.3 degrees,
it is 
33.27742721 degrees, 
your choice,
of the semi major axis, which actually has nothing to do with the solstice calculations.

That using these examples of mathematic slop you prefer to post,
is allowable at Cydonia,
and the occupants there didn't know better and built huge megalithic pyramids,
with enormous factors of error.

You think that Carlotto did not understand the semi major axis ratio between Mars and Earth?

I think he was quite well aware of it.
But I don't see it mentioned anywhere in his work.
He was quite distinct at 33.3 degrees for a solstice.

Cydonia City grid:
Carlotto -- 33.3 degrees 

The Cydonia City Grid:
EA semimajor axis 33.277 --- degrees.

Carlotto has been replaced by EA.

Now lets look at your above quote from the links again:

I see Petrie  ---> 33.15 meters
I see Atkinson figure at ---> 33.3  meters
You know what I don't see?
I don't see anything close to your semimajor axis---> 33.277~ degrees

You know what I also see?
My rectangle produced an angle of 33.3074 degrees <---

Looking at the quote -- you highlight in bold print and  HUGE NUMBERS  with RED COLOR,
My ---->  33.3074 degrees
is significantly
more accurate and precisely close to Carlotto's 33.3,
than your:

as a matter of fact,
My ---->  33.307-- degrees
30 times more accurate to Carlotto's choice of 33.3 <---
than your 33.27742721 degrees

EA semimajor axis  33.27742721

Carlotto Cydonia City Grid  33.3 degrees   Hi

Note as well, that I distinctly stated:
that my 33.3074 degrees could be ---Coinci-Code {coincidental code}
you hang on to your 33.277-- degrees tooth and nail and don't budge.

The problem with trying to work with you EA,
is that I have to confront all the OLD BULLSHIT seen in all your links.
I refuse to be distracted by this nonsense.
You can have this thread,
but you can't do the math,
because all you can do is copy other peoples math as a venue of their slop, 
to justify your slop. Lol

Your slop isn't any worse than theirs, it's about the same.

You can either use Petrie's EXACT DATA,
or throw all of it out the window and play Slop Ball,
where when you hit a foul ball behind the plate into the stands,
from the BaseBrawl diamond ... 
it becomes a hit and an RBI  {run batted in}.

So which is it EA?
Carlotto's 33.3 degrees,
for the City Grid,
or your 
33.277--- degrees?

No, you cannot have it both ways,
no matter how hard you want to make it squeezy weezy work.

Either you are correct,
or Carlotto is correct.
Pick one, the two numbers do not match.
No fucking excuses and long posts full of bullshit data with bold print in red.

I was quite ready to accept Carlotto's 33.3 degrees in Barnys's thread.
I found a unique Harmonic Code correlation to  --- 33.33333333 degrees 
but I never posted the math,
because I decided that:
Carlotto's data took precedence and preference.
You obviously don't.
So the only assumption anyone can make is that you believe that you are correct, 
by looking at the sheer repetiton of your posting the "semimajor axis".

Do you have any support data that isolates 33.27742721 degrees as the Cydonia City Grid?
No, you cannot use Carlotto's 33.3 as support data.

However I can produce spectacular support data for 33.3074-- degrees.
But even then,
it is still possibly Coinci-Code.
because a plethora of convergences can be arranged to ---Carlotto's 33.3 degrees.

Like this:
Kabbalah 137 / 90 = 1.5222222222 semimajor axis?  I don;t think so.
{90 / 137} Kabbalah = 33.30228475 degrees
90 / Fine Structure Constant 137.0359991 =  33.29537718 degrees

both equations are significantly closer to Carlotto's 33.3 degrees
your "semi major axis"

So essentially your "semimajor axis" data is just ... relatively weak Coinci-Code data.

My work was about the Ancient Math Lesson with the rectangle.

It simply was a far better example that -- happens -- to work with Carlotto's 33.3,
far more accurate than your "semimajor axis".

Your ego is all wrapped up in your "semimajor axis" defenses.

I could care less if my -- Ancient Math lesson rectangle -- offers the Cydonia Grid or not.
My rectangle was about:
square root phi  and  square root two in tandem,
extracted from the ancient rectangle geometry Whip
which for all practical purposes probably has nothing to do with Carlotto's 33.3 degrees,
but even in that regard,
it is still a far better choice than your "semimajor axis",
just from the standpoint of ---- accuracy.
But my data ... might ... be on the money to Carlotto, ... I don't know and would never claim it to be.

now at the beginning of your last post
you ask me this -- 
from an image --- with no reference link <---

Quote:how about this rectangle:
[Image: Stonehenge_Station_Stones.gif]

No, YOU -- do the math -- and geometry <---

Let's see what -- YOU -- have, 
and can do with that rectangle <---

Don't copy and paste other people's work,
show us something original by EA .... from that image of Stonehenge.
No slop allowed, 
Stonehenge wasn't built with Slop Math or Slop Geometry Nonono



The primary negative of the last few posts were the internet linked idiots data,
that produce the "metric royal cubit",
and also claim that the data they supply comes directly from Petrie data.
It doesn't even come close to the Petrie definition of Royal Cubit.
0.5236 meters
does not even enter within the scope of the Petrie spread 20.615 to 20.625 inches.
I will belabor that point later.

One major positive from the last couple of posts,
was the link reference to ---> the "Indus Short Yard"
33 inches
2.75 feet

Pure cubit 20.625 that is <---

2.75 feet --  is an alternative ancient cultural selection -- for the Megalithic Yard,
and should be addressed.

It is highly viable and valid as a "megalithic yard".
I believe that early Stonehenge opted for 2.72 feet, 
but that may have changed as thousands of year transpired.
I have developed a -- Cubit System Model Pyramid -- to express the 2.75 foot megalithic yard.

The pyramid design sets the height at -- 
100 megalithic yards of -- 2.75 feet = 3300 inches = 160 x 20.625 cubit

The pyramid is a Khafre Pyramid Hybrid, with a rectangular base.
The resultant geometry,
aligns two side faces with the Khafre Pyramid side face angle -- arctangent {4 / 3}
The other two side faces are:
arctangent 2,
which sets the Khafre Pyramid side face angle --> into the Apex Angle as well!  Guitar
By using arctangent 2 --- for the opposing slope,
the inverse phi geometry function is also displayed.

The big surprise is the evidence of the prime 13 <---> emerging in the corner angle tangents,
and also in the diagonal lengths,
square root 13 -- to be specific.

Square Root 13 -- also emerges in the sines and cosines of some of the corner angle geometry.
{excessive data not needed -- see if you can isolate the sines and cosines yourselves}

Once the prime 13 is seen in the angle tangents,
then the Earth Sidereal Constant can be expressed as well in those angle tangents.
I have supplied that data,
for the Apex Angle tangent -- of the Corner Angles -- cross secting isosceles triangles.


A side note:
see the height -- 275 --- and the diagonal length -- 2x <--- IN FEET <---
align them:
as a fractional tangent <---  {2x / 275} ---> take arctangent to attain -- 60.98285938 degrees
look at the angle:
60.98285938 degrees
the cosine squared --->  =  0.23594118  =  64 / 272 --- {2.72 megalithic yard}
the cosine squared ---> =  0.23594118
the Masonic Code -- Menkaure Pyramid slope angle tangent --->  {21 / 17} minus ONE <---
the sine squared =  208 / 272 --- thus with the 208 as a function of the prime 13, 
{208 = 13 x 16},
you can then write the sine squared,
as a function of the Earth Sidereal Constant 365.2564103 days -- with the megalithic yard of 2.72 feet

How about that?

[Image: HLrCR6x.jpg]



oh and I forgot ...

note the spectacular angle tangent that emerges in the rectangular base Whip

27 / 99

0.27 27 27 27 27~

{27 / 99}  is the perfect conversioin factor to jump from Khufu Pyramid base length in feet <---
directly to:
exactly ---- ten times the cubit in inches --- used to attain that base length !!!

{27 / 99}  x  756  =  206.18 18 18~ -- cubit {1134 / 55}

{27 / 99}  x  755.9457323  =  10 x  pi cubit 20.61670179~

{27 / 99}  x  756.25  =  206.25

it works for all possible base lengths


An equation was inadvertantly left floating in the last image,
that should have been edited out.
The image has been amended.
Rather than remove the errant image, I simply added the edited image.

The equation reads:
206.18 18 18~ 
in the prior image, center right. 

[Image: kO9YyoK.jpg]
Be sure to review that last very important post of magnificent geometry,
and the edit of the image.
Being swamped here with my two old homes under summer repair construction,
{I do all the labor}
I often just do not have the time to 100% edit all images of a boo boo. Scream 
Somehow the equation that got edited out in the second image,
escaped my editing view.
It had been placed there to float for other usage,
and I forgot to remove it.
Often I just run through the math in editing to make sure the math is correct,
and miss an errant equation that would normally be removed.

The fractions that compose an angle tangent, 
will give you clues to other resultant angle tangents,
when angles are added together by being tangential,
or in a triangle as displayed here in this image. 

Modern geometry teaches geometry students to only look at the decimals.
Almost all these grad students don't have a clue,
that many of their tangent decimals,
can be square roots of simple fractions,
or even just simple to complex whole number fractions,
creating those decimals.

All triangles equal 180 degrees -- when all three angles are added together <---
In this image,
the base angles of the triangle presented,
are the fundamental ancient examples of fractional tangents for the Khufu and Menkaure Pyramids.

The selection of the tangent {21 / 17},
for the Petrie style 51 degree angle,
is also seen in the Masonic Code examples I have previously posted.
that when an isosceles triangle is constructed for the {21 / 17} tangent,
you set the height at -- 21 units,
with two half base lengths of -- 17 units.
{on either side of the height line}
This gives you the base angle with tangent {21 / 17}.
A simple {not isosceles} triangle:
21 units high,
with a base leg of 17 units ---> thus has a HYPOTENUSE from peak to base end point.
That hypotenuse equals:
square root 2  -- times -- square root 365 <---> 365 as in the calendar count of the Earth year.
That is no coincidence.
21 squared
plus 17 squared = 730
take square root of 730,
for the true length =  square root 730  =  square root 2 --  x -- square root 365 Whip

The Khufu Pyramid slope angle seen,
14 / 11
is of course the ancient formula derived from a 440 cubit base and 280 cubit height.
Sacred Seked 5.5 <--->  {14 / 11 = 7 / 5.5}

The two base angles of the triangle ---> seen in the image diagram,
Khufu and Menkaure Pyramids -- side face slopes --
thus produce the Apex Angle as seen in the image,
which displays the fraction:
9849 -- divided by -- 2247 ---> ten Venus sidereal of 224.7 days {NASA data}

The ancient angle tangent code processing then is displayed with the two numbers:
9849 and 2247.
Uniquely, the reduced fraction {469 / 107},
reveals the NASA data Saturn sidereal cycle,
with the Saturn to Earth synod -- NASA data 378.09,
greater than 7 sigma accuracy Whip

That kind of accuracy cannot be coincidence, and indicates studied ancient intent in the geometries.

[Image: OQ0dilG.jpg]


Ancient cultures sacred geometries were accounted for by the first astronomers. 
The planetary movements, especially the planetary synods,
the Lunar Month, and the Earth sidereal and tropical years, 
were quite important to ancient study.

The very first and simplest astronomoical cycle,
was the Earth sidereal and the Venus synod.
These time lines were defined in CALENDAR COUNT <----
Earth -- 365 days --- Venus synod to Earth -- 584 days.
The ratio, or fraction of these two:
5 / 8 = 365 / 584
initiates the ancient Phi progressions.
{see earlier work here}
365 and 584
operate together with the prime -- 73.  5 x 73 = 365 ... 8 x 73 = 584

Another important but simple cycle was created to Calendar Account for:
the Mars sidereal -- 687 days
and streamlines the Venus synod to Earth to:  583.95 days <--- 
NASA Venus synod = 583.92 days <---

so this cycle uses the prime -- 17 --- 

17  x  687 Mars sidereal = 20  x  583.95 Venus synod.

Note that the prime 17 --- is particular to the Megalithic Yard 272 = 17 x 16,
and ancient Pi value 3.1416
3.1416  =  {231  x  17}  -- divided by -- 1250
5 x 231 = 56 x cubit 20.625

Also -- 231 x {sqrt 5 / sqrt 2} = 365.2430698 --- that is my Grand Unification Tropical Earth Year.

You can also see that value work with a Khufu Pyramid height of 481.25 feet  =  5775 inches,
280  x  20.625 cubit  =  5775 inches  =  365.2430698  x  {sqrt 5 / sqrt 2}  x 10  Applause

All ancient cultures knew how to re-account their LONG COUNTS,
for planetary timelines by simple reasjustments.
the Mayans in particualr were quite adept at this.
One simple method to display this:
100  years of 365 days  =  36500 <---
to quickly readjust:
just add 25 days:
36525 days .

Which brings us to more sophisticated geometry to present -- CALENDAR COUNT,
inherent within the ancient geometry infrastructures.

So the easiest way forward,
is to simply use the calendar counts:
Earth year   =  365 days
Venus synod = 584 days

Khufu Pyramid slope tangent -- 14  /  11  =  4  /  aPi .... where  aPi = 22 / 7

The Khufu Pyramid slope is based on the ancient formula:
440 cubit base length -- 280 cubit height.

The ancient usage of -- aPi = 22 / 7 -- involves ancient Pi progressions,
and geometry functions as well.

I have seen attributions to the Pyramid of the Sun -- slope tangent as -- 2 / Pi <---
This is the same problem,
seen in faulty determinations of the Khufu Pyramid using 4 / Pi -- as the slope tangent.
The ancient formula is -- 4 / aPi.

Thus the Pyramid if the Sun,
much more likely would have the ancient formulas applied.
2 / aPi -- or  -- aPi / 2 you retain ALL the connections to the Khufu Pyramid,
and the cubit systems.

The Pyramid of the Sun -- has scant reliable measurements,
to offer quality determinations of true slope.
we see an unusual alignment of geometries,
that reveal:
the hidden code with the Earth year and the Venus synod in calendar count,
when working:
the slope geometry possibilities with --- aPi.

2 / aPi  =  11 / 7  =  99 / 63

aPi / 2  = 7 / 11  =  63 / 99  =  {4400  x cubit 20.618 18 18~} -- divided by -- {6912  x cubit 20.625}

thus will apply the potential of the -- aPi -- ancient fundamental Pi progression constant.
{for ancient pi progressions -- see earlier work here}

The image diagram has FOUR STEPS -- using the method of the 180 degree triangle,
to display angle geometry tangents -- potential -- 
and thus document the resultant angle tangents:

Step 1
angle A -- Khufu pyramid slope
angle B -- slope tangent ----------- 2 / aPi --- 
angle C Whip

angle C -- displays the calendar count Earth year -- with cubit 20.625
angle C -- can account the Venus synod,
by simply replacing:
{9 x 365} -- with -- {5.625 x 584} ... and then aligning the equation into all whole numbers.

Step 1:
I also show how the sines and cosines are accomplished.
the Megalithic Yard -- 2.72 feet --- shows up in the sines and cosines Whip

Step 2:
creates an isosceles triangle,
using the slope tangent:
aPi / 2 -- as angle B -- in the base of the triangle.

the purpose is to expose -- the Apex Angle tangent <----

the awesomely important result!
The Apex Angle tangent,
is EXACTLY Jawdrop
the Menkaure Pyramid height <---> using cubit 20.625 <---

213.8888888~ feet  =  2566.66666~ inches
use the formula -- that I solely found and originated in 2009  Smoke
Menkaure Pyramid dimensions,
{9 / 4
Khufu pyramid dimensions.
{9 / 4}  x  213.8888888~ feet  =   481.25 feet = 5775 inches =  280 x cubit 20.625 <---

the Apex Angle -- of this triangle -- has the tangent = 2.138888888~  =  {770 / 360}
-- note cubit 20.625 in the number 770 --

Step 3:
The first isosceles triangle,
is displayed to show the Khufu Pyramid Apex Angle tangent.
That tangent:
KP = {308 / 75}  =  4.106666666~

This leads directly to step 4.

Step 4:
The two prior -- Apex Angles -- are installed into a new triangle.
the Khufu Pyramid Apex Angle:
is set at the top of the triangle.
The Step 2 -- Apex Angle -- with tangent = 2.138888888~,
is situated,
as the bottom right corner angle,
of the 180 degree ful triangle.

Angle B2 ---> is the resultant angle geometry.
And there it is.
through the cycle of ancient geometry applications,
the new angle tangent,
for angle B2,
not only retains and prominently displays the calendar count Earth year 365 days,
in the tangent equation,
the equation also reveals -- the numerator -- 355 -- 
from the important ancient Pi value:
355  /  113  =  3.14159292
the other highly important ancient pi value used with -- aPi --  
in the ancient Pi progressions.

Using these two pi values in the progression of course,
produced the 10 decimal accuracy Pi value:
104348  /  33215 
{see earlier work here}

Angle B2 -- can also be expressed with the 584 day Calendar Count Venus synod,

584  x  {56  x  20.625 cubit} 
divided by
355  x  64  x 37
tangent angle B2

Step 5 ---> is a challenge --- what is tangent of angle E ... Guitar
angle D 
tangent = aPi = 22 / 7

Yes, it reveals excellent ancient sacred geometry code.

[Image: RX7M1lX.jpg]



Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)