Thread Rating:
  • 3 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
SOHO X Files and Interplanetary Anomalies
#1
This is thread for any and all SOHO anomalies of the Past and Present,
as a matter of record to be accumulated in one place.
On that end it may become somewhat dry and commentless,
but SOHO anomalies disappear in various threads never to be resurrected as cumulative evidences.
I will add content slowly but surely.

This thread is also for ANY planetary anomalies anybody would like to post,
in order to keep anomalies compiled in one source,
rather than letting them disappear into the various threads on such subjects
never to be seen again.

Please feel free to post any space image of interplanetary anomaly, any planet,
as a matter of record, and as a resource material for everybody compiled in one venue.

Focusing on SOHO anomalies here at the onset is because:
Upon the advent of the Haiti quake
the solar CME's have returned in full force recently,
possibly signaling the end of the unusually long dead solar CME cycle
that was almost a mini Maunder minimum.
The return of very active solar CME cycle is long overdue,
and we have had a distinct resurgence of CME activity possibly indicating the imminent return
of the long period comets like NEATV1,
which may even be the forerunner entourage of the eventual incoming Planet X.

The hot solar cycle of ever increasing CMEs may finally have returned.

Several small comets have been seen recently crashing into the sun,
and each of the last big EQs on Earth have coincided with a fine CME solar release.

.


The latest CME was extremely unusual with an angular elbow bent arc extending away from the sun.
In the middle of the several hour CME emerging
an anomalous object appeared next to the sun in ONE time frame only.
See Below.
NASA calls these...Cosmic Noise,
...dust and ice particles...lens flares... micro meteor satellite impacts....
NASA labels everything anomalous like this,
and
in most cases they are correct <----!
but that only aids them in burying truly anomalous subjects that are not what they claim,
and sweep under the carpet of "forget about it".

The object in the image next to the sun is NOT
a lens flare,
a symptom of Cosmic Noise,
a Phil Plait dust particle,
or a NASA ice particle.

It is an object, that came out of the sun IMO with the odd angular component of the CME.
That object may just be a huge plasma ball,
it may be something completely of the wall-ien.
It is only in one time frame of the total available CME image time stamps.


[Image: 20100413_1618_c3_1024.jpg]

[Image: 20100413_1342_c3_1024.jpg]


McNaught passage ... it came between Mercury and the sun.
[Image: current_c3small-4.gif]


Remember when SOHO failed to operate during the passage of NEATV1 ....AND...Bradfield? in a one year period?
and NASA Joe Gurman's comment on SOHO malfunctions...
"...this only happens to SOHO once or twice a year..."

Right Joe...sure, daddy-O.


Here are the navy sites that explain ...debris and dust particles, cosmic noise etc....just to be fair,
and I have selected a couple of fine images.
There is also a written list...if anybody knows how to access the written list images,
please let me know.

If the debris list link won't open,
you have to use the first two links to access it


http://sungrazer.nrl.navy.mil/index.php?p=cometform

http://lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil/index.php ... ent/debris

http://lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil/debris_gif/

ftp://lasco6.nascom.nasa.gov/pub/lasco/ ... ebris_List



A couple of select images from Navy debris images, and the Navy has excluded some of the best
over the last few years.

[Image: 970820_1129c3.gif]


[Image: 971230_2022c2.gif]

Reply
#2
Oh my God ... what the hell is that thing in the bottom left image ?

[Image: stnv1qq1.jpg] ??
Advocating for the Space Elevator.<br /><br />User Anonymous revealed ! He is actually me (a previous account). Registered in 2001.<br /><br />~~ Where ever you are Samurai Jane, I miss you
Reply
#3
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8635207.stm
Never invite a Yoda to a frog leg dinner.
Go ahead invite Yoda to a Frog leg dinner
Reply
#4
Great image at that link on the first images from the solar dynamics observatory.
Some fantastic stuff is coming our way via that piece of equipment.
Image:
[Image: _47688537_composite20100330st.jpg]



DJ says
Quote:Oh my God ... what the hell is that thing in the bottom left image ?

[Image: 971230_2022c2.gif]


That is one of Phil Plait's and now NASA's ...dust particles directly in front of the SOHO camera.
The theory is that the dust particle is passing by super slowly
during the 20 second time frame that the lens is open to take an image of the sun.
The main question is
....why does it have the multiple helix forms within?
There is an older SOHO image similar to this, and it has been a long time to find a correlating image.
I was quite happy to find this new image ABOVE to accompany the older Navy image BELOW.
I had to make a collage to save image space and such.
the overlay images are filters applied to the anomaly by Green Dog.

sept 1999... comet lee passing Jupiter....with 8 other major coincidences, one was a major reverse spike
in some form of solar energy output...it has been several years now... .
It was also on this exact date that ..Ambilac...if you remember him, forecast the return of one of the pharoahs...

[Image: SOHO%20Navy%20lasco.jpg]


So the prevailing NASA theory is that the dust particle has the helix forms inside...
because...
SOHO satellite had a micrometeor impact right when the image was taken and thus the dust particle
vibrated causing the lens distortion and inner helixes in the trailing light form as it passed by.
Reply
#5
Quote:So the prevailing NASA theory is that the dust particle has the helix forms inside...
because...
SOHO satellite had a micrometeor impact right when the image was taken and thus the dust particle
vibrated causing the lens distortion and inner helixes in the trailing light form as it passed by.

Whoever buys into this NASA lie is a fool
Seek and ye shall find. JESUS
------------------------------------------
I am a recovering vegetarian   Hi
Reply
#6
I don't believe it!!!
I found the old SOHO 1024 pixel images of NEATV1

454
554
654
and
754
timestamps

[Image: 20030218_0454_c3_1024.jpg]


[Image: 20030218_0554_c3_1024.jpg]


[Image: 20030218_0654_c3_1024.jpg]


[Image: 20030218_0754_c3_1024.jpg]
Reply
#7
Muaha  <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/bump.gif" alt="Bump" title="bump" />

I am in heaven, I didn't think that these still existed this large

The anomalies two days after NEATV1
[Image: 20030220_2342_c3_1024.jpg]
Reply
#8
Ah, that's interesting. I had not taken in that these are 20 second exposures. That NASA description makes a lot of sense - maybe too much sense -. I can see how you might get that kind of spirograph like pattern building up in zero G either from a particle rotation or sat vibration, not that I'm really saying that IS the explanation.

I notice the previous anomaly (bottom of 2003/02/20 23:42) is a more advanced version of the same phenomenon just starting opposite it above the sun. Could these be larger comet break off boulders or material being lit up by the solar wind and flaring up ?
Advocating for the Space Elevator.<br /><br />User Anonymous revealed ! He is actually me (a previous account). Registered in 2001.<br /><br />~~ Where ever you are Samurai Jane, I miss you
Reply
#9
Quote:I notice the previous anomaly (bottom of 2003/02/20 23:42)
is a more advanced version of the same phenomenon just starting opposite it above the sun.
Could these be larger comet break off boulders
or material being lit up by the solar wind and flaring up ?

excellent DJ,
I am glad that you noticed the exact anomaly that makes the NASA explanation insufficient.
Note as well:
there is another identical anomaly in that image ABOVE the sun as well,
that DJ has identified as an "advanced version".
It is just a smaller one further back DJ,
but they are traveling together in front of the sun, by possibly some mutual energetic attraction.

When I first encountered these anomalies in image feb 20 2003 at 2342
I challenged Phil Plait to explain them.
Phil being unable to, went to better NASA authority and the ...dust particle in front of the SOHO cam was born.
This is a plausible explanation for many of the Navy images that portray this debris patterning
of trailing long lines
with a dark section running inside along the middle interior.

The image DJ is referring to however shows distinct spherical heads at the ends of the trails.
Almost all SOHO
and Navy debris images do not exhibit this spherical head.
They may indeed be parts of cometary debris.
I am more along the line of accumulated interstellar grains in a cohesive nuclei
traveling with an electrical charge.
They may be the forerunners of comets....baby comets...? ,...lol...who knows.
Also,
we don't really know how big the actual particle is.
Note how these "debris particles " are coming from far away and in towards the SOHO satellite.

OK so I will also point out some attributes of these two anomalies 2 days post NEATV1,
that do not align with almost all "debris particle" phenomena,
in particular
the secondary trailing.... plumes ....for lack of better description.
These secondary "plumes" are exactly what you see with comets passing the sun.
Just how big are these....dust particles....?
A lot bigger than dust or generic debris IMO.
False color images added to show the trailing plumes possibly better.

[Image: NEATV1%20anomaly%20comp.jpg]


[Image: NEATV1%20anomaly%20b.jpg]

Reply
#10
This is over 20 seconds so tracing back the smeared out movement (notice it is not a spirograph like the dust particle was) should reveal what is painting light all over the SOHO image.

Quote:Their concentration can be measured in ice cores, allowing a reconstruction of solar activity levels into the distant past.[18]  Such reconstructions indicate that the overall level of solar activity since the middle of the twentieth century stands amongst the highest of the past 10,000 years

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycl ... c_ray_flux

No citation for that ... have you seen this data Vianova ?

I'm monitoring this alarmingly near by star now ...

[Image: wmspaceweather.gif]

When is someone going to notice that someone put the Earth right next to an exploding white hole !?  <img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/thwak.gif" alt=":thwack:" title="thwack" />
Advocating for the Space Elevator.<br /><br />User Anonymous revealed ! He is actually me (a previous account). Registered in 2001.<br /><br />~~ Where ever you are Samurai Jane, I miss you
Reply
#11
Quote:Their concentration can be measured in ice cores, allowing a reconstruction of solar activity levels into the distant past.[18] Such reconstructions indicate that the overall level of solar activity since the middle of the twentieth century stands amongst the highest of the past 10,000 years

Quote:No citation for that ... have you seen this data Vianova ?

I have read this before and it is good to question the "citation" being absent.
Might have originated from this pdf
http://www.warwickhughes.com/icecore/zjmar07.pdf

here is another with data
http://www.eawag.ch/organisation/abteil ... ariability


On the issue of space debris
and particles
particle storms....

check this out:
three successive images show a sudden particle or Dust storm develop
with the onset of a CME

In the first image there is no storm,
then suddenly,
and just how big...are those particles?
Where are they in relation to the camera?

If they are closer to the sun, they are much larger than dust or particles,
or has the CME excited all that debris so intensely
as to display such a system wide phenomena ,...?
or a close in camera shot of dust...?


[Image: 19971106_1241_c3_1024.jpg]


[Image: 19971106_1346_c3_1024.jpg]


[Image: 19971106_1412_c3_1024.jpg]

<img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/cheers.gif" alt="Cheers" title="cheers" />
Reply
#12
high speed vortex's?
Never invite a Yoda to a frog leg dinner.
Go ahead invite Yoda to a Frog leg dinner
Reply
#13
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1 ... ideos.html
Never invite a Yoda to a frog leg dinner.
Go ahead invite Yoda to a Frog leg dinner
Reply
#14
I've been watching threads about SOHO for years, way back in the AN days even. For as long as I can remember, SOHO seems to go blank when significant events happen, such as a comet dropping by the sun or into it. I don't understand the reasoning for trying to keep us all in the dark so to speak. What are they hiding by cutting us off from those events? The ones that do get through, see some of the pics above, are explained away in ridicuous ways. It still amounts to trying to hide what is really going on. I see comets setting off CME's, so what is so secret about that? I don't get it. Why the secrecy? What earthshaking new information would be revealed? Anyone have any ideas why?
&quot;Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.&quot; --Aldous Huxley
Reply
#15
Arnik says
Quote:For as long as I can remember, SOHO seems to go blank when significant events happen,
such as a comet dropping by the sun or into it.
I don't understand the reasoning for trying to keep us all in the dark so to speak.
What are they hiding by cutting us off from those events?
The ones that do get through, see some of the pics above,
are explained away in ridicuous ways.
It still amounts to trying to hide what is really going on.
I see comets setting off CME's, so what is so secret about that?


They are absolutely scared to death to admit to Electric Universe.
Why?
Because therein lies free clean energy, and / or the secrets to intergalactic space travel.

PS
we
just
had
another CME
with an anomaly ...the bright spot at two oclock ....
note the fluffy stuff coming off the end of the anomaly

anomaly not seen in other time stamped  images

[Image: 20100503_0618_c3_1024.jpg]


[Image: 20100503_1042_c3_1024.jpg]


<img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/cheers.gif" alt="Cheers" title="cheers" />
Reply
#16
OK, I can buy the EU reason. How long will they be able to keep that tech down? It's like the flat earthers, sooner or later it is going to come out. It won't come out quickly enough for the Gulf of Texaco, but what's a fishing or tourist industry if you are BP? They are on the hook for only $75 million dollars of damages after it is over. They made something like $5.6 billion last quarter. And whenever someone rediscovers the free energy trick, they and their experiment disappear. I can't think about this anymore, I get too angry.

Who is telling NASA to hide this from us?
&quot;Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.&quot; --Aldous Huxley
Reply
#17
Forget about them. We only hold ourselves back.

Whoa ! So we are getting the first sun spots of Solar Cycle 24. The first since Cycle 23 that peaked in 2000. Look up your I Ching. Coincidence or not the numbers 23 and 24 are very significant when it comes to these Solar Cycles. Are these objects and high energy events from the Soho camera visible at other cycle peaks and troughs ? Or is there something special about this one that, after all, is peaking on Cycle 24 in the year 2012.
Advocating for the Space Elevator.<br /><br />User Anonymous revealed ! He is actually me (a previous account). Registered in 2001.<br /><br />~~ Where ever you are Samurai Jane, I miss you
Reply
#18
This should have been one of the most high energy sun spot cycles we have seen in a long time. I remember reading about how several different cycles affecting sunspots all peaked at the same time in 2012, but without more research I can't name them off the top of my head. However, this was supposed to be a very active cycle, and so far, it has been one of the most quiet. Perhaps the calm before the storm.

For those who don't pay attention to sun spots and Coronal Mass Ejections, CMEs, during the end of the last cycle there was the most massive CME yet recorded. The charts on Space Weather said a CME ranked as an X35, higher numbers being stronger, hitting Earth could be the start of an extinction event. The solar wind at that level would be strong enough to strip Earth of its protection and expose us directly to UV and other hard radiation. This particular CME wasn't directed at Earth but it was in the end rated as an X40. We dodged a bullet. This cycle was supposed to be even more active.
&quot;Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.&quot; --Aldous Huxley
Reply
#19
Hi Arnik. Strange you should post that , there's just been a big one. Check out SOHO.
Sunspots are picking up too.
Reply
#20
If you are in the shadow of the big hill and you look up and see a flock of birds burst into flame, don't be leaving the shadow for a while. Scream
&quot;Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.&quot; --Aldous Huxley
Reply
#21
Quote:This should have been one of the most high energy sun spot cycles we have seen in a long time

It most likely still will be,
that is why I started this thread more than anything.

Quote:so far, it has been one of the most quiet. Perhaps the calm before the storm.

Bingo.
It has been heating up since January, and that coincided as starting about ten days before the Haiti quake.
We may have been in eye of a huge storm.

Quote:during the end of the last cycle there was the most massive CME yet recorded.
The charts on Space Weather said a CME ranked as an X35

What I am hoping for is the return of a series of Long Period comets to stimulate massive CMEs.
The series of small comets that passed by recent with some of the CMEs may be forerunners
of the Long Period Comets like NEAT V1.
Or better yet would be a surprise visit from Planet X, but I will settle for a few NEATV1s and Bradfileds etc.

For a while there a few years ago it was spectacular.
The ride might get great, and the predictions of a super intense solar cycle will probably come true.


Quote:Hi Arnik. Strange you should post that , there's just been a big one. Check out SOHO.
Sunspots are picking up too.

Thanks!
They are coming fast!
2nd one in two days, so what is firing them up?
Feel free to post any unusual anomaly or good CME.

Looks like the CME shot out a big wadskie with a tail

CME Du Jour

[Image: 20100506_0318_c3_1024.jpg]


[Image: 20100506_0342_c3_1024.jpg]
Reply
#22
Might the comets and the anomalies be to do with this ?

Paper  - Is the solar system entering a nearby interstellar cloud ?

Title: 
    Is the solar system entering a nearby interstellar cloud
Authors: 
    Vidal-Madjar, A.; Laurent, C.; Bruston, P.; Audouze, J.
Affiliation: 
    AA(CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique Stellaire et Planetaire, Verrieres-le-Buisson, Essonne, France), AB(CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique Stellaire et Planetaire, Verrieres-le-Buisson, Essonne, France), AC(CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique Stellaire et Planetaire, Verrieres-le-Buisson, Essonne, France), AD(Meudon Observatoire, Hauts-de-Seine; Paris XI, Universite, Orsay, Essonne, France)
Publication: 
    Astrophysical Journal, Part 1, vol. 223, July 15, 1978, p. 589-600. (ApJ Homepage)
Publication Date: 
    07/1978
Category: 
    Astrophysics

Source: http://biocab.org/Cosmic_Rays_Graph.html#anchor_77

(from the link above) ADDENDUM (12/23/2009): CONFIRMED!!! THE SOLAR SYSTEM IS CROSSING AN INTERSTELLAR COSMIC CLOUD JUST NOW!!!

From the paper:

"A model, based on dilferent observations ofthe local tntetstellar medium. indicates the presence
ofa very close interstellar cloud in front ofthe Scorpius-Ophiuchut assoetauon (almost in the
direction of the galactic center) approaching the solar system from a dtrtance of about 0 D3 pc
at a velocity of about 15 - 20 kms -1"

...

"The existence of a very close (ll.03v¢ rn the Soo
Oph direction) and possibly dense (ri, > l0’ern")
cloud as shown in Figure 6 seems to be consistent with
the observations of the nearby interstellar medium
such as those of the gas embedding the solar cavity.
Moreover, a nearby cloud would offer a reasonable
explanation of the strong variation ol the D/l-l ratro
with respect to the considered line of sight.
Besides the necessity of observing the interstellar
gas to confirm the presence of a nearby cloud, other
implications are that (i) the actual interstellar deuterium
abundance and its origin should be rexamined
(ii) this nearby cloud might manifest its presence in
perturbations of comet orbits"

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-d ... =AST&high=

Advocating for the Space Elevator.<br /><br />User Anonymous revealed ! He is actually me (a previous account). Registered in 2001.<br /><br />~~ Where ever you are Samurai Jane, I miss you
Reply
#23
A cloud could also manifest by exciting the sun or by reducing the amount of energy we receive from the sun. Either of those would not be good for us, unless you have a perverse sense of "wow" and enjoy the suspense of whether or not a CME will cook earth first before the reduced solar energy freezes it. There are a couple of weird things I've noticed with CMEs and increased number of sunspots; earthquakes and extreme weather. Ok, I'm perverse, this is going to be a wild ride, yee haw!!!

Space weather today, cloudy with a chance of flares in the afternoon.
&quot;Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.&quot; --Aldous Huxley
Reply
#24
There could be such events as you describe. I don't know. I'm interested in the relationship between increased energy output and consciousness. This is put by Arguelles in the Mayan Factor and he states that the Maya were mapping these energy relationships as they relate to human history. Actually Arguelles has been accused by Mayan elders of misappropriating Maya culture but I think he is simply positing a western synthesis.

[Image: 800px-Carbon14_with_activity_labels.svg.png]

It's interesting to compare what was happening at the last maximum with now, which appears to be going off the scale.

[Image: 970722_1546c2.gif]

This one looks like the wobbling dust particle trails from above - but why does it pass behind the sun ?

http://lasco-www.nrl.navy.mil/debris_gif/

[Image: 970812_1350c3.gif]

[Image: 970829_0402c3.gif]

[Image: 980114_0340c3.gif]

[Image: 980624_0844c3.gif]

[Image: deb_970708c3.gif]
Advocating for the Space Elevator.<br /><br />User Anonymous revealed ! He is actually me (a previous account). Registered in 2001.<br /><br />~~ Where ever you are Samurai Jane, I miss you
Reply
#25
Excellent you must have gone through the navy link for those images.

Quote:This one looks like the wobbling dust particle trails from above - but why does it pass behind the sun ?

they don't pass behind the sun,
They pass behind the solar occulting disk { I think it is called} which is attached to the lens somehow.

Those two articles on the interstellar cloud are both the same article,
It is just reprinted in 2009 and has more to do with global warming effects.

Quote:this nearby cloud might manifest its presence in
perturbations of comet orbits"

That part is interesting indeed.
The Oort cloud has something in it as well that is redirecting long period comets orbits.
This was the basic premise of analysis by Matese and Murray RBA analyzing comet paths.
They both predict some large gravitational force is out there in the Oort cloud, possibly Jupiter sized or more massive.
Brown of NASA predicts an earth sized planet and is currently looking for it.
Matese work;
http://www.viewzone.com/nemesis.html
Murray:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/467572.stm


I have seen some of the choices you posted in debris particle images,
but there are some interesting details to peruse.

where did you get your last image?
where is the time stamp?

That 1997 image is wild,
and it occurs JUST after a small CME about 2 hours earlier that had been building for about 4 time stamp frames
Note in the second image upper left at 10 oclock the bright object has a small tail


[Image: 19970829_0228_c3_1024.jpg]
[Image: 19970829_0402_c3_1024.jpg]
Reply
#26
Last image is at the bottom of the FTP archive dir listing that I linked above.
Advocating for the Space Elevator.<br /><br />User Anonymous revealed ! He is actually me (a previous account). Registered in 2001.<br /><br />~~ Where ever you are Samurai Jane, I miss you
Reply
#27
the 1997 image of the huge bright splotchy debris was a good find DJ, thanks.

Obviously NASA SOHO is correct on many "debris" classifications.
How close to the SOHO cam many of them are is under speculation or even qualified scrutiny..

here are a couple of wild ones from the past

remnant of a CME at sun bottom and this wild debris particle meandering by...

[Image: NEATV1%20debris1.jpg]



In this image SOHO scientists had to come up with:
a particle piece of flat shielding led to the unusual splash of light reflections there from the sun....

[Image: NEATV1%20c2.jpg]

Reply
#28
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100510.html
Seek and ye shall find. JESUS
------------------------------------------
I am a recovering vegetarian   Hi
Reply
#29
if by crazy you mean that it is not staying the same, i would think that it is normal, what do you expect?
more or less hudsons bay again
Reply
#30
viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12819
On a satellite I ride. Nothing down below can hide.
Reply
#31
Glad I found something for you. I'm enjoying digging up something genuinely wild at last.

~~~

http://users.usinternet.com/jmccanney/index.htm

James McCanney - Plasma Discharge Comet Model

This Web site is for those who do not believe that comets are dirty snow balls. Enter here to find out what they really are. (P.S. Welcome Hale-Bopp as the newest planetary member of our solar system)

Home Page
[Mail]

The theoretical work you will encounter here is one of the best kept secrets in the Astronomy world. It was developed in the late 1970's while the author was on the faculty of the Physics and Mathematics Departments of Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y. My work was in theoretical Celestial Mechanics and Plasma Physics (for the layman, these are the the studies of planetary motion and electrified gases in outer space). Initial papers were published in astrophysics journals while later papers were quietly returned without referee comments.

The work showed among other things that comets were not dirty snow balls sublimating (vaporizing) in the solar environment, but were a complex plasma discharge interaction involving an asteroidal comet nucleus with the "solar capacitor", the capacitor being the result of a differential flow in the solar wind of high energy particles leaving the sun. The balance of charge in the solar system and a myriad of of other previously unknown effects were predicted by the theory, including the existence of an electron sheet arriving from the sun at a cometary nucleus and resulting x-rays. Only recently have these been verified by observation. The new comet theory also explained that the tail matter was not moving away from the comet nucleus, but was being drawn in by electrical forces millions of times more powerful than gravity or solar wind forces alone. Essentially a comet was now seen as a huge "cosmic vacuum cleaner". Comets were being captured into the solar system by the existing planets and the comet "tail drag" helped to circularize their orbits. Many commonly stated beliefs regarding the nature of the solar system were being dispelled with more subtle explanations.

The theoretical implications were devastating to commonly held beliefs. Comets were not dirty snow balls, the solar system did not form all at one time 4.5 billion years ago and dozens of other theories developed to allow new data to comply with these "axioms of Astronomy" might not be correct also. At any rate, an entire rethinking of astronomical theory was required.

As you may well imagine, this did not (and still does not) set well with some scientists, while others have recently (especially after Hale-Bopp) begun to realize that Hale Bopp is an extremely large, powerful and highly energetic comet. It's doing things you would not expect from a docile little snow ball (x-rays and snow balls in the same theory, hmmmm?? ), let's get serious. Why has NASA completely shut down dissemination of information as Hale-Bopp passed Perihelion?

The new "Plasma Discharge Comet Model" theory was presented at an invited talk by the author in 1987 at Los Alamos National Laboratories to approximately 50 plasma physicists under the title "Are Comets Really Dirty Snow-balls?" At this point noone could be convinced of cometary x-rays, high energy discharges or other effects. Noone had ever witnessed a really big comet like Hale-Bopp.

On May 27, 1997 the author will again present this theory as a "poster session" at the Spring Meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) held in Baltimore, MD. I have been attempting to find recognition for this work for almost two decades. All I will say here is that as a scientist I am dismayed at the treatment this work has received and the lack of response and proper referencing by members of the Astronomy/Space Science community. Most of all I am dismayed that the experiments defined to determine the true nature of comets (as well as the data that has been taken) have been withheld by those in charge of publicly funded instruments and space craft who favor the "dirty snow-ball comet model".

I have attempted for nearly 20 years to work in a friendly manner within the ground rules of the established scientific community. It is unfortunate that the scientific process that is in place and which is supposed to be self regulating simply does not work. It is unfortunate that we have to resort to the Internet to bypass this stalled system. With the Internet available hopefully this situation will be changed.

~~~

Is this the strange effects we are seeing here ? A comet as a sort of discharge capacitor does make a lot more sense to me. The guy above discovered "sun tornadoes" which could be some of the stranger electromagnetic (?) phenomena that we see here - the ghost like blobs ?

Here's some more. These from 2003 that I dredged from my archive.

[Image: comet1_sm.jpg]

[Image: comet2_sm.jpg]

Here's the MPEG of the previous image you posted.

http://djbarney.silentflame.com/storage/030220_c3.mpeg

The artifacts (electro tornadoes?) appear just after the comet. Yippee 
Advocating for the Space Elevator.<br /><br />User Anonymous revealed ! He is actually me (a previous account). Registered in 2001.<br /><br />~~ Where ever you are Samurai Jane, I miss you
Reply
#32
That is absolutely outrageous!
I will put it in the SOHO thread as well and credit it to you.
Thanks, I will look on SOHO as well to see if it caught anything at that time frame
edit
I found the date of the event ... Apr. 12-13, 2010
Reply
#33
That mpeg was cool. A bit fast but excellent.

I liked this selection of yours as well and went and found it.
There was absolutely nothing going on with the sun when these objects passed the satellite,
in any time frame around this one.
The large bright streak in the bottom half of the image
is made by streak of movement of the object as the small bump on the top of the trail
That object is basically a spherical ball of light but you only see the top of the light sphere
as a bump on top of the center of the large streak.
Why the object glows so much to cause such wild image glare and distortion
is hard for me to determine.
I do however think this to be larger than a debris particle and further out from the SOHO camera
than debris particles seen floating by in other images.

[Image: 20060610_1242_c3_1024.jpg]




Mayito found and posted this fantastic APOD video of the sun
releasing an amazing Prominence
don't miss this!

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ap100510.html


here is the actual prominence in a still shot

[Image: sunprom3_soho.jpg]




It was followed by a subsequent CME as stated in the caption at the video link.....
The CME that I started the thread with!
and here is the mpeg for that:
http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00002438/
[Image: soho_20100413_0954_1606_prominence.gif]

<img src="{SMILIES_PATH}/cheers.gif" alt="Cheers" title="cheers" />
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)