Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Syria = Libya 2.0
#1
http://canspeccy.blogspot.com/2012/02/ar...er-in.html

Arab league monitors find slaughter in Syria the work of foreign-backed subversives

A report by the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) based on a one month inquiry by 160 monitors failed, as Pepe Romero reports in the Asia Times, to conclude that:

... the "evil" Bashar al-Assad government is indiscriminately, and unilaterally, killing its own people, and so regime change is in order.

So the report was either ignored (by Western corporate media) or mercilessly destroyed - by Arab media, virtually all of it financed by either the House of Saud or Qatar. It was not even discussed - because it was prevented by the GCC from being translated from Arabic into English and published in the Arab League's website.

Until it was leaked. Here it is, in full.
(Go to website for link. It is a pdf)

The report is adamant. There was no organized, lethal repression by the Syrian government against peaceful protesters. Instead, the report points to shady armed gangs as responsible for hundreds of deaths among Syrian civilians, and over one thousand among the Syrian army, using lethal tactics such as bombing of civilian buses, bombing of trains carrying diesel oil, bombing of police buses and bombing of bridges and pipelines. (my emphasis)

... So the current "Arab-led drive to secure a peaceful end to the 10-month crackdown" in Syria at the UN is no less than a crude regime change drive. Usual suspects Washington, London and Paris have been forced to fall over themselves to assure the real international community this is not another mandate for NATO bombing - a la Libya. US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton described it as "a path for a political transition that would preserve Syria's unity and institutions".
Protest

See the youtube on the site. Apparently Clinton et al are trying to crucify Putin for condoning 'senseless killing'. Distraction from the facts perhaps?
“Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.” <br />Sir John Harrington
Reply
#2
So the Syrian government didn't kill any peaceful protesters, what about the not so peaceful protesters.  What is peaceful?  Someone who is silent? Or someone who isn't shooting?

What is a "shady" gang?  So who is sponsoring the gangs?  This is where these kinds of things get real murky.  Is Assad using proxies to do his dirty work or are western powers paying the gangs or are the religious extremists or are the rebels doing it to themselves so they can complain and get help?  Or, is it a combination of two of the above?  The truth always seems to be the first casualty.

The writers of reports can also be suspect.  Exxon didn't find any global warming.  Even if a report is true, honest and unbiased, how could we know?  Was the leaked report tweaked and leaked to give it more credibility when it really is totally bogus?

I have to take the US position with a grain of salt too.  Although we have never been strong Assad fans.

I guess I have just become a skeptic.
&quot;Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.&quot; --Aldous Huxley
Reply
#3
By 'shady gangs' I would assume the same (or similar) ones who were originally led by the murdering, convicted, AQ terrorist and now commander of the Libyan National Transitional Army, (The 'Rebels' to you and me) Abdelhakim Belhadj. Ironically he is now joint suing CIA and MI6 for having him extraordinarily renditioned in Libya for 6years. Google it.  Blink

Evidence suggests that lot of his men apparently had served their time fighting US troops in Afghanistan and the like. Bengazi was apparently a famed recruiting place for these people.

If "They hate our freedoms", why were they so happy to fight for NATO? :holycow:
“Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.” <br />Sir John Harrington
Reply
#4
http://www.infowars.com/leftist-media-re...-invasion/

...Our old friend Belhadj again...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/al-qaeda-ter...ition.html

...And further back in time...

http://tarpley.net/2011/03/24/the-cia%E2...s-in-iraq/
“Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? Why if it prosper, none dare call it treason.” <br />Sir John Harrington
Reply
#5
http://blog.alexanderhiggins.com/2012/02...rce-83901/
Quote:Despite objections rebel violence is being ignored and threats Russian Military intervention, the UN passes a resolution calling for regime change in Syria.
Earlier today another US backed resolution on Syria was submitted to the UN.  The resolution follows the same language as the one Russia and China vetoed just weeks ago, again failing to officially acknowledge violence is being perpetrated by rebel forces. Today’s resolution was passed by the UN general assembly, where no one has veto power. Russia is beating their chest in protest, vowing they will not allow Syria to suffer the same fate as Libya.
Never invite a Yoda to a frog leg dinner.
Go ahead invite Yoda to a Frog leg dinner
Reply
#6
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/...d-in-syria
'Suffocating in the streets': Chemical weapons attack reported in Syria
Never invite a Yoda to a frog leg dinner.
Go ahead invite Yoda to a Frog leg dinner
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)