Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 4.5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next President of the United Fates of America
[Image: 13906757_10206755432220891_7012003270495...e=5855D776]

Christopher Kent
The Iranian Nuclear Scientist that was just executed in Iran because he was a mole for the CIA according to Iranian Officials.....had been discussed in emails found on Hillary's private emails...where she called him "our friend" and we need to "get him out"......if this is not a dierect consequence of her unsecure server...I am sure the bias press will say there is no conection..it is all coincidence.....

(08-08-2016, 04:26 AM)Vianova Wrote: ...
An ex CIA director and Clinton supporter ... trashes Trump's chances against Putin.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-ele...nt-n624786
Ex-CIA Director: 'No Doubt' Putin Views Trump as 'Unwitting Agent
Quote:Morell told ABC's "This Week" 
that he had "no doubt" Putin viewed Trump as an "unwitting agent" of Russia, 
and noted that as a trained KGB intelligence operative, 
Putin had manipulated people "much smarter than Donald Trump."

"He played this perfectly, right? 

He saw that Donald Trump wanted to be complimented. 
He complimented him. 
That led Donald Trump to then compliment Vladimir Putin 
and to defend Vladimir Putin's actions in a number of places around the world. 
And Donald Trump didn't even understand, right, 
that Putin was playing him," Morell said.


The CNN parade of TV news panel fools becomes a daily anti Trump carnival of clowns,
and now the Washington Post chimes in with their brand of Trump trashing.

excerpts from the article
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/...story.html
Putin would eat Trump’s lunch
Quote:The real issue is that Trump and Putin share the same nihilistic approach to international relations. 
Together, they could transform our world.

 Trump may not match Putin’s use of violence. 
But his unreserved embrace of falsehoods, 
cynicism and the amoral pursuit of narrow interest is as pure an American expression of Putinism Lol
as we are likely to see. 
That raises the ominous question: 
What would the world look like if they were both in power?

Trump would likely grant Putin’s most cherished wish, 
which is to sit as an equal with the U.S. president, 
dividing up the world into spheres of influence.

Trump pictures himself striking tough deals with a like-minded strongman. 

He surely underestimates Putin’s ruthlessness 
and is ignorant of his conception of U.S.-Russia relations as a zero-sum game. 

After 15 years in power, 
Putin is skilled at the arts of deception, betrayal, sabotage and tactical aggression. 
Trump, by comparison, is a dilettante Whip

So the consequence of a Trump-Putin world would not just be the triumph of amoral statesmanship; 
it would be the rise of Russian influence at America’s expense.

...
http://nypost.com/2016/07/31/report-rais...ing-reset/
Report raises questions about ‘Clinton Cash’ from Russians during ‘reset


Report: Hillary Clinton's Campaign Mgr John Podesta Sat on Board of ...

Aug 1, 2016 - Hillary Clinton’s campaign chairman John Podesta sat on the board of a small energy company alongside Russian officials that received $35 million from a Putin-connected Russian government fund, a relationship Podesta failed to fully disclose on his federal financial disclosures ...

Sheep
Follow the Money
and Morell is a little weasel
who wishes to be Hillary's CIA Director .

http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2016/08/...s-a06.html
Quote:The former CIA official declares Clinton “highly qualified to be commander in chief,” praises “her belief that America is an exceptional nation that must lead in the world,” and notes that in the internal discussions over US intervention in the Syrian civil war, “she was a strong proponent of a more aggressive approach.”

Morell denounces Trump as unqualified to be president, in part because of his volatile personality and lack of national security experience, but mainly because of his supposed connection to Russia.

He writes: “President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia was a career intelligence officer, trained to identify vulnerabilities in an individual and to exploit them. That is exactly what he did early in the primaries. Mr. Putin played upon Mr. Trump’s vulnerabilities by complimenting him. He responded just as Mr. Putin had calculated…

“Mr. Trump has also taken policy positions consistent with Russian, not American, interests—endorsing Russian espionage against the United States, supporting Russia’s annexation of Crimea and giving a green light to a possible Russian invasion of the Baltic States. In the intelligence business, we would say that Mr. Putin had recruited Mr. Trump as an unwitting agent of the Russian Federation.”

This extraordinary allegation adds fuel to the campaign launched by pro-Clinton pundits like New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, portraying Trump as a “Siberian candidate” whose campaign represents a Russian intervention into the US elections.

The Clinton campaign has embraced and promoted these McCarthyite smears, issuing a video Friday posing the question, “What is Donald Trump's connection to Vladimir Putin?” The video, available on YouTube, consists of clips of right-wing media figures, including Joe Scarborough, Charles Krauthammer and George Will, denouncing Trump for his praise for Putin, interspersed with questions suggesting that Trump has secret business ties to Russia and is being financed by Russian oligarchs.

In style and political content, the video recalls the ravings of the John Birch Society, the anticommunist organization of the 1950s and 1960s that claimed leading US political figures, including President Eisenhower, were Soviet agents.
This underscores the drastic shift to the right in the political orientation of the Democratic Party. It does not oppose Trump on the basis of his militarism or his authoritarian contempt for democratic rights. Instead, the Clinton campaign is presenting itself as the authoritative party of the military-intelligence complex and the political establishment, appealing to billionaires, the military brass and the intelligence agencies.

In the form of Trump vs. Clinton, the US electoral system has provided working people the “choice” between an openly fascistic demagogue and an avowed representative of the Pentagon, the CIA and the financial establishment hell-bent on launching new imperialist wars.

The barrage of claims by the corporate media that Trump, as distinct from “normal” US politicians, is deranged deserves only contempt. Both Trump and Clinton are deadly enemies of the working class. They may be opposed to one another in the election campaign, but that is no argument for working people to take sides. Rather, workers and youth must draw the conclusion that the entire political system is deeply dysfunctional and should be swept away.

The Democratic Party is appealing, not to the mass opposition and disgust with Trump on the part of working people, but to the opposition to Trump within the US ruling elite, whose main concern is that the Republican candidate’s friendly gestures towards Putin, his open questioning of the value of NATO, and his expressed reservations about US wars in the Middle East are cutting across the bipartisan foreign policy consensus in Washington.

This poses immense dangers to the working class. The logic of the Democrats’ anti-Trump campaign is to channel mass opposition to Trump behind preparations for war with Russia, a nuclear-armed power. In the event of a Democratic victory—increasingly likely according to polling this week—Clinton will claim a mandate for war policies that can be carried out only through a frontal assault on the living standards and democratic rights of American workers. This demonstrates that the differences between Clinton and Trump are purely tactical: how best to subordinate the working class to the war drive of American imperialism.

As the World Socialist Web Site has previously pointed out, Trump did not crawl out of the Manhattan sewers or a Munich beer hall. He emerged from the well-heeled, corrupt circle of real estate speculators in New York City, where he had the closest ties with the Democratic Party machine. He was molded and promoted for decades by the corporate-controlled media and the political establishment. He and the Clintons are old friends: he invited them to one of his weddings; they asked for his money for their political campaigns and bogus charities.

If Trump is suddenly branded as a monster who must be kept out of the White House, it is only because the US financial aristocracy and the military-intelligence apparatus have a different monster in mind, one they consider more dependable: Hillary Clinton. She’s the monster who is on message—on Ukraine, Russia, NATO and the anti-Chinese “pivot to Asia.” She knows which generals to salute and which billionaires to flatter. She’s a “safe pair of hands,” which means she can be relied on to kill the right people.

That is the meaning of Clinton’s endorsement by the CIA’s Michael Morell and, more generally, the wave of support for her campaign from billionaires, Republicans, generals and the media.

Patrick Martin
Never invite a Yoda to a frog leg dinner.
Go ahead invite Yoda to a Frog leg dinner
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Next President of the United Fates of America - by Wook - 08-08-2016, 12:12 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)